Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Lets see how long it takes Dems to get this ruling into court.
1 posted on 11/28/2016 9:20:23 AM PST by jpeg82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jpeg82

they just need “the courts” to simply award the presidency to hilary and be done with it


2 posted on 11/28/2016 9:22:32 AM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jpeg82

This is good. They should be able to complete by Dec 13th now. The WI Election Commission already stated that the recount would be happening on nights and weekends. So much for the delaying tactic in WI.


3 posted on 11/28/2016 9:22:34 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Technique: A test “deck” of ballots with a known count are run through the tabulator machines. Out comes the count. It matches the known count. Machines are declared fine.

The tabulators are used to do the election day ballots. Result emerges.

Done. Probably less than 24 hrs.


4 posted on 11/28/2016 9:23:12 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jpeg82

http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2016/11/28/wisconsin-recount-process/

Wisconsin Recount Could Begin Thursday

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The recount of Wisconsin’s presidential election could begin Thursday,
after payment is received from one or both of the little-known candidates who are requesting it.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission voted unanimously Monday to approve the recount timeline. Both
Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein and Independent presidential candidate Rocky De La Fuente
requested a recount Friday, but only Stein has been actively raising money for the effort that could
cost $1 million or more.


5 posted on 11/28/2016 9:25:06 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jpeg82

Sounds like the drudge article was correct about what the dem strategy is. Which is to delay the results for all three states so they can’t participate in the Electoral College. Then even though Trump would have more EC votes then Hillary, if he falls short of 270, it goes to Congress. Hillary will then claim that Trump was selected and she won the popular vote.

Fortunately, Trump is already counter-attacking that without millions of illegals voting, she would not have won the popular vote.


6 posted on 11/28/2016 9:25:20 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jpeg82

Yup.

They will need to get a court order for a hand recount.

And that means showing why a machine recount would be inaccurate.


8 posted on 11/28/2016 9:26:19 AM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jpeg82

Stein is supposed to have the money to pay for the recount submitted no later than tomorrow.

Let’s see if she deems the “no hand recount” ruling not to her liking, calls off the recount, and keeps the money.


9 posted on 11/28/2016 9:29:50 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jpeg82

Now I kind of wonder if liberal hackers won’t target the recount just to say: “Look, I told you so”.


10 posted on 11/28/2016 9:31:10 AM PST by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jpeg82

Everyone knows there is a 1% error in voting - registration numbers are the most inaccurate. Thus, the Dems knew for years they could sue their way to the WH - “crooked” Hillary is more accurate than you might think.


30 posted on 11/28/2016 9:52:25 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jpeg82

She will withdraw. There is no reason to recount if it cannot be delayed past 12/13.


32 posted on 11/28/2016 9:54:16 AM PST by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is..." - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jpeg82

Wisconsin knows how to count and recount votes. They’ve been doing it at the beck and call of crybaby Democrats for years.


34 posted on 11/28/2016 9:58:09 AM PST by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jpeg82

They are trying to go for a do over....You heard it here first, folks.


41 posted on 11/28/2016 10:07:02 AM PST by Garvin (The Fourth Estate is The Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jpeg82

So does “our side” not have anyone willing to push the meme that the dumblecrats are trying to disenfranchise the voters of WI, PA and MI with these pointless recounts? If those states’ results are not certified, they do not get their electoral votes? Those millions of voters votes do not count. And we ALL want everyone’s votes to count, right? I mean thats their stated point of all this....

Seems like that would knock a huge hole in the breathless “ooo boy...a recount....watch out now,,,,”


57 posted on 11/28/2016 10:56:43 AM PST by Adder (Mr. Franklin: We are trying to get the Republic back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jpeg82
Until Hitlery is declared the winner they are going to SHUT - UP !
61 posted on 11/28/2016 1:19:31 PM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else need s said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson