COMPLETE MICHIGAN Vote Recount Numbers Revealed -– And The Official Winner is…

World Politicus ^ | 11/27/2016

[SeekAndFind]

In the closest race for president in Michigan’s history, Republican Donald Trump is hanging on to a 10,704-vote win over Democrat Hillary Clinton.

During the tight presidential race in Michigan on election night, it has finally been reveaed that Trump won the state with almost 11k more that Hillary.

Results were revealed on Wednesday after the votes had been recounted within every county.

Before this count, Trump had a 13, 107 vote lead over Hillary, but even after the votes were recertified in each county, Trump still held a 10, 704 vote lead.

Wisconsin’s Board of Canvassers will finally seal the results on November 28. The electoral college votes in all states, including Michigan’s 16 elecotarates, will cast their ballots on December 19.

“Many people have asked about Michigan’s process for counting ballots and certifying election results. Please be aware that all 1,521 Michigan cities and townships completed ballot counting and reported unofficial results by the morning of Wednesday, Nov. 9,” according to a statement on the Secretary of State’s website. “The county canvassing boards, as they do after every election, then began their work to review and certify the results from each precinct.”

Throuhout the country, Trump ednded up winning 306 electoral votes, and Hillary won 232. However, Hillary has an impressive 2 million vote lead in the popular vote. Donald Trump is the only GOP who has won the state of Michigan from 1988 onwards.

The estimated numbers that will be given over to the state Canvassers Board on November 28 are:

• Donald J. Trump, Republican: 2,279,543
• Hillary Clinton, Democratic: 2,268,839
• Gary Johnson, Libertarian: 172,136
• Jill Stein, Green: 51,463
• Darrell L. Castle, U.S. Taxpayers: 16,139
• Evan McMullin, write-in: 8,177
• Emidio Mimi Soltysik, Natural Law: 2,209
• Michael Maturen, write-in: 517
• Tom Hoefling, write-in: 95
• Laurence Kotlikoff, write-in: 87
• Ben Hartnell, write-in: 39
• Monica Moorehead, write-in: 30
• Cherunda Fox, write-in: 10

[SteveH]

keyboard spew alert

[cynwoody]

Maybe the recount will declare the next president to be:
“Cherunda Fox, write-in: 10 votes”

whoever she may be, she’s gotta be a lot better than HilLIARy, ha !!!!!!!!!

Cherunda's campaign site says she is "54, African American and American Indian." It embeds a nifty video about Hillary:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hT7SDjso9uo

If it were between Clinton and Fox, Fox would have my vote!

[rollo tomasi]

If this is their objective, then what happens when the recount is finished and Trump still wins those States (Regardless if they are certified in time)?

All Repubs have to say is how butthurt the dems are, solidify the process, and pound that meme in 2018/2020. Also, say goodbye to the façade of goodwill because the dems' temper tantrum destroyed any chance for that.

Poorly thought out tactic that will only resonate with a pocket of reprobates while the rest yell "Scoreboard!!!" at a sycophantic "industrial" media complex.

[Cowgirl of Justice]

Sorry Hillary....Your throne is in the little room with the sink.”

But don’t use the sink. Your husband has claimed that as his.

[USS Alaska]

Frankin is from Minnesota.

Minnesota, Michigan, what the heck, they both start with an 'M', which makes his votes portable.

BTW it's Franken...with a diaper!!!

[windsorknot]

How much money was wasted on this fiasco?

[The_Media_never_lie]

Who cares? /S

he is still down over 220,000 votes statewide and can’t manufacture that many votes.

---

We should care because, it keeps the in practice, and there will be another close national election soon. Republicans should refine anti vote manufacture methods.

[trebb]

Thanks for highlighting the line that says that the votes in very county were recounted - kind of indicates that another recount should not change except for infinitesimally....if it does, then there’s something seriously wrong.

[faithhopecharity]

Same here. Thanks.