I was using extreme sarcasm to make my point with a poster who was trashing Trump for his “cravenness” in utilizing the heinous crimes the Clinton Foundation committed against impoverished countries. If you read the other poster’s comments, and mine in context, this becomes clear.
When you posted to me, I dropped the sarcasm. I don’t believe you can quote from my response to you anything that differs from what you’re saying.
So you agree, evidence/witnesses/victims likely exists in foreign countries. Including victims who were defrauded or left holding an empty bag in these Clinton scams, in countries wherever the foundation did business.
My point is, and maybe you agree, is who gives a damn if hard evidence comes from inside or outside the U.S.? And Trump can say whatever he wants regarding his desires to prosecute or not prosecute this poser. Fact is if a foreign government provides the new AG good evidence of crimes committed by HC and or her foundation, it’s his duty to pursue it.