Aggressors prevail and manage the history of their actions after they win.
Trump should say that if significant delay results, he is going to reconsider his views about the priority of prosecution of the obvious National Security Law violations by the Clinton's and their allies.
Bad response from the Donald.
Aggressors prevail and manage the history of their actions after they win.
Trump should say that if significant delay results, he is going to reconsider his views about the priority of prosecution of the obvious National Security Law violations by the Clinton’s and their allies.
I respectfully disagree. The DOJ is not an instrument to use for political reasons as we have seen in the past. The DOJ represents “justice for all” and it must be apolitical. The truth is the truth about the Clinton foundation. The truth is the truth about her failure to protect classified information. The American people, at least half the country, would simply like to know the truth. The Haitian people (and every day Americans who donated to help them) would like to know the truth.
Offering a quid pro quo involving legitimate investigations for a political or legal action would be a horrible mistake.
Anything he does at this point will be tainted to the opposition, but he just needs to tell the DOJ to do their jobs as he promised he would. He DOES NOT need to comment on anything of the sort until after the results are given. This was the mistake Obama made because it reeked of “command influence” and we all (correctly) called him on it.
You should notify Trump and tell him your opinion of him being oh so wrong - I am sure he will add you to his team.
To remind the person and the public of what that person said is a bad response?
Being bold enough to do what the news media is not doing in fairly reporting the issue, does not mean Donald was agitated in the least when he sent those tweets, he was simply stating facts of what she said and then gave his concise view that it was a bad idea to waste time and money on recount.
People need to read news articles and not latch onto the writer’s emotional spin. We have more “short story writers” than journalists writing our news these days.