Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

Thanks for the correction.

Since you are in Pennsylvania, do you agree that Steins/Clinton’s chances of getting a statewide recount/audit request approved by a judge are next to nil in Pennsylvania?

I guess we could find out as soon as Monday or by mid-week whether their will be any of this recount BS in Pennsylvania (or likely not), since she must go to court this Monday after the election results are certified by the SOS and has no evidence to back up her claims. Hopefully for all of us she wont get her hearing in front of the most corrupt partisan judge in Pennsylvania!!!


50 posted on 11/27/2016 12:13:21 AM PST by dsm69 (Boycott News Media/Hollywood Advertisers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: dsm69
You never know what a judge may do. In the case of the Florida Supreme Court, if you recall, when the FL Supremes made their second partisan and highly erroneous ruling, one of the judges who was on-board the first time dissented, saying, in effect "We done been beyotch slapped by the US Supreme Court once already. You really want to look like a bunch of asses yet again?" Apparently, six of them still did.

All I can say is that there is a standard, and if they rule on the law there is no reason for them to grant a recount.

52 posted on 11/27/2016 1:17:11 AM PST by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson