Posted on 11/25/2016 1:38:54 PM PST by dirtboy
“Jeez, I’m getting sick of all these “Woe is me! They’re about ready to steal the election!” comments.”
The same idiots that SWORE that it was going to be stolen on Nov 8. Hell they pretty much had EVERY state being stolen by massive Democrat fraud.
Just our resident shortwave radio show listeners and conspiracy kooks.
Dude, we all get it. We're pretty smart here, and some of us are even developers ourselves.
OH is not being recounted. Trump won by almost 10 points and 450k votes.
People need to chill. This is all to rile up the brainless libtards.
Would appreciate your response to the question below:
Stein is, of course, covering for Hillary. And the effort is more than likely funded by Soros. And it is aimed at Trump, to be sure.
But to what end, exactly?
It’s inconceivable that a recount will turn up (or disqualify) enough votes to reverse the result in all three states. And, even if it did, we would then be engaged in a constitutional crisis of unprecedented magnitude with an uncertain outcome. It would not necessarily redound to Hillary’s favor.
So, what is the game...really?
Could it be that the’Rats intentions are more modest...and insidious? Are they instead intent on simply delegitimatizing the Trump administration and sowing doubt about our constitutional system? Instead of an attempted coup d’etat, is this designed to weaken the national fabric in advance of a future coup d’etat?
You’re right. It’s the electors who can vote for whomever they wish in the ofiginal constitution.
We should take a lesson from this.
If on the miniscule chance they overturned the election, I would go to war.
And I would never, ever stop.
Ever.
You get it . But many are not coders . And Soros could have thousands of bots in botnets taking over PC’s in the USA too.
We do know that Stein raised more in 2 days than in the whole campaign and exactly the amount needed to file for the Recount on Thanksgiving.
Is it possible that Soros is contributing the funds? My understanding is that a Bot was doing the contributing, so that it looked like a lot of individuals were contributing.
Is it possible the Election Supervisors doing the counting are Democrats?
And, just like all other times, they will count, and count, and count, until they get one more vote than they need, and then declare it official.
Right. Gore was hoping to steal that one before the Supreme Court finally stepped in. But at least Gore was the one who stood to win. Why is Jill pushing this and not Hillary?
“But Jill wants recounts in Michigan and Pennsylvania, too.”
Why honor her by using her first name. She now has more accurate descriptors.
And Michigan was paper ballots . So no “hacking” could have been done.
“If they succeed (it will be vote fraud if they do, guaranteed), the Republic is finished.”
In more ways than one, but primarily no presidential election would have any meaning anymore. The link to the Constitution and the rule of law would be completely obliterated.
So? She's not getting anywhere.
BTW, you should call yourself a developer. A coder is a lesser animal. ;)
1) they have secured corrupt officials and judges in each of the three states needed to allow handlers to come in and change the count.. only remotely possible.
2) these states had rigged votes to begin with, but they didn't anticipate the overwhelming turnout for Trump so their original fraud failed with too few phony votes, but since they rigged it the first time around without getting caught they are confident they can rig it a second time around , and knowing ahead of time the votes they need, they will make sure the count is in their favor this time, while planting fake news of Russian cheeting or something to account for all three states flipping.
3) other plans may be knowing full well the results cannot be overturned in three states, but delaying the process and then having it cut short by the gore supreme court ruling, will be enough to fuel the narrative that Trump is a selected leader, and his presidnacny will be illlegiment in the minds of protesters , with large scale civil unrest that is further being planned,
4) other ?
Again, nobody throws away that much money without a plan and a responsible committee to oversee the plan proceeds forwarded.
LOL . Ok I’ll try developer instead of coder from now on ! thanks!
I’m looking for this answer...
A machine recount will definitely be performed, but a hand recount has to be ordered by a judge?
Anyone?
It also gives the opportunity to bubble in a second vote for Hillary and null out an absentee ballot that was cast for Trump originally.
Maybe Soros lost his money on Hillary and wants to buy a new horse.
The poster I responded to had their math wrong irrespective of Ohio being incoorrectly listed. That was the point of that post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.