Posted on 11/25/2016 1:15:21 PM PST by PJ-Comix
“The Commission has received the Stein and Del La Fuente recount petitions. Details and news release posted soon at http://elections.wi.gov"; - twitter
She will claim that she didn’t have enough time and then just keep the money.
They won’t know the cost until sometime next week.
“a few weeks ago, got passed by a van with “Jill Stein for President!” scrawled in shoe polish on every window aft of the steering wheel.”
Are you sure it was Shinola? It might have just been sh!t.
Doesn’t matter — she just filed.
It won’t matter though since it will still result in Trump win.
Your scenario sounds like the way it SHOULD be done.
But Stein clearly believes that her request for a recount would result in every ballot cast being included in the recount.
One would assume that the lawyers involved are acquainted with the WI laws governing recounts.
Regardless of what the recount reveals, they will still charge that there were clearly irregularities.
I also believe they are hoping that the recount cannot be completed by Dec. 13, the deadline for a state to report its results and that a court will be called upon to shut down the process.
Where, I wonder, is the money coming from? Soros? Clinton Foundation? Washington Post? Krypton planet?
OK, this is a little out there. I blundered into an obscure website about an hour ago that claimed that Jill Stein's recount effort was being funded by a bot. That website appeared to be toxic as it crashed my Firefox so I woun't give the link out willy-nilly. It claimed that ever since the donation page opened yesterday, that donations were entering with a nearly mathematical precision, regardless of the time of day (donations just as steady at 3: am as they were at 3:00 pm).
So I decided to do my own impromptu test and got what, I think, are very interesting results. I first logged onto JS's donation website at 3:44 PM EST this afternoon. I finally got my sampling sh%t together by 4:00 PM and took readings every 5 minutes until 4:30. These are the results I got:
Time, reading ($), delta $, Delta time (min), rate of change ($/min) 3:44, $3990,481.84, NA, NA
3:53, 4,012,481.85, $21,634.01, 9 min, $2,403.78
3:55, 4018,237.85, $6,122.00, 2 min, $3,061.00
4:00, 4,027,407.69, $9,169.84 , 5 min, $1,833.97
4:05, $4,036,133.64, 5 min, $8,725.95, $1,745.19
4:10, $4,044,530.03, 5 min, $8,396.39, $1,679.28
4:15, $4,052,919.66, 5 min, $8,389.63, $1,677.93
4:20, $4,058,634.66, 5 min, $5,715.00, $1,143.00
4:25, $4,065,474.09, 5 min, $6,839.43, $1,367.89
4:30, $4,073,973.09, 5 min, $8,499.00, $1,699.80 .
As you can see, the data is remarkably consistent. If this pattern holds, the website should hit its funding goal of $4.5 million about 8:30 PM EST tonight. Also, if you back calculate to the zero dollar point, this funding effort began about 36 hours ago, which if I am not mistaken, is very close to the truth.
These are NOT spontaneous contributions. This is a BOT programmed to make contributions at a set pace while minutely varying minute to minute rates to obscure. But these guys are not very bright, it seems.
Whose BOT is it? What account is it donating from? This stinks to high heaven.
Laughing at your tagline!.... however, he DOES have adequate cheetos to put him there...
Election Recount Manual - 2016
http://elections.wi.gov/sites/default/files/publication/65/recount_manual_11_2016_pdf_17034.pdf
Does anyone know how much money she raised over the course of her campaign?....and yet, in a matter of just a few days, after the election has ended, she had no trouble "raising" over $5 million to fund a recount. Isn't that amazing?
How much are Soros and Hillary paying Stein to be Hillary’s stand-in?
Do they know they have created enough bogus votes to change the result?
Otherwise, why spend the $5 million plus that this will cost?
Just got done visiting over there. They seem a little...bitter. LOL.
NPR is reporting that it will be done, a statewide recount that is.
“Otherwise, why spend the $5 million plus that this will cost?”
$5 million is a meaningless amount to Soros. Like fishing in your pocket for a dime. He’d spend that just to create more chaos and weaken confidence in our election system.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.