I bet you that the states reject the filings and just move on.
1. She doesn’t have standing - a recount would not change her performance in the races.
2. The “scientists” who performed the analysis state flatly that they have “no evidence” that there was fraud perpetrated.
3. The recount is ultimately at the discretion of the powers that be in that state - Secretary of State and/or Courts. Remember what we went through in 2000 with a recount in just a couple of counties in FL? No way the powers that be want to go through that again.
This is all a big show to attempt to delegitimize Trump’s election. It will fail.
I bet you that the states reject the filings and just move on.
I bet they have a Soros Judge already to go
2. The “scientists” who performed the analysis state flatly that they have “no evidence” that there was fraud perpetrated.
3. The recount is ultimately at the discretion of the powers that be in that state - Secretary of State and/or Courts. Remember what we went through in 2000 with a recount in just a couple of counties in FL? No way the powers that be want to go through that again.
This is all a big show to attempt to delegitimize Trump’s election. It will fail. "
Excellent points and spot on conclusion.
They will use it as an excuse to spend the next 4 years whining that Trump would have lost "if the election had not been rigged".
It wins for one side.
Just their attempt to do this proves that Trump was correct when he declared that the elections and the process is a rigged system.