Let’s try this again. These are contributions to a candidate for federal office. These contributions are going directly to the candidate’s campaign. They are subject to campaign contribution limits and strict reporting requirements.
Again, as I said before, it is FAR more likely that they made a script to fake the total amount of contributions than it is for using a ‘bot’ - why bother? First, why bother welcoming a bot? You know you’ll have to account for all those contributions, and it is a heck of a lot of work to manufacture loads of names (and industries) for your FEC filing. Since they can simply hand money to the ‘Jill Stein Defense Fund for Legitimate Voting’ and skip the whole disclosure thing, again, it’s a whole lot of work for zero gain.
While I appreciate that you’ve latched onto this concept, you’ve missed the most basic tenet of liberalism: Lie about what you’ve got. I see absolutely no reason why it wouldn’t apply to campaigns, since we’ve seen it before.
Seems like you want us all to relax. do you know everything Soros has planed Remember they passed Obmacare on Christmas . is this a coincidence they are passing this WI recount when Americans and Trump think the election is over on Thanksgiving? Soros fingerprints all over this and they are doing all this for what? All these billions and all these people he's paying and you know more than all that .right?/.
The web master had to let all Soro’s bots in . We don't know all the details. We do know Stein just raised more in 2 days than all the campaign and exactly $160,000 per hour at 3 am yesterday. yeah you know everything, right?
bots can't figure out the “prove your’e not a robot” tests without having knowledge of the test’s code.