A Pennsylvania recount for Hillary Clinton? A ‘nightmare scenario,’ explained (or Stein)

BillyPenn ^ | November 23, 2016 | Anna Orso

[Chode]

question one) do all three states use the same voting machines?

question two) are they $oros supplied machines??

[mrsmith]

Actually about 10% of the Pa voting machines DO have a paper trail- they are nearly all in districts that voted for Trump.
The Clinton voting districts mostly DO NOT have a paper trail.

So a recount would effectively only affect Trump votes.

In a recount unverifiable voting machines are just tested to see if they work correctly. Very easy to hide evidence of tampering.
It would be interesting if several Philly machines were to fail recertification. I just don’t believe the tampering would not be hidden.

[goldstategop]

Any recount would actually increase Trump’s vote total among the margins.

Liberals are idiots.

[poinq]

Pennsylvania has a democrat governor. And they have democrats everywhere. So its hard to say that there is wide spread voter fraud in Pennsylvania that favors the republicans.

The second issue, is that they have to flip Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin to change the results. Two states, even the biggest two won’t help. And getting that recount in Wisconsin would be tough.

[jimbug]

The talking MSM heads will be the first casualties.

[GodAndCountryFirst]

Honestly, I don’t even care if the “secret computer nerds” are right (and they aren’t). God and all good Americans want DJT in the White House. However that happens, it is a good thing.

Now we proceed with dismantling just about everything change made to the federal government over the past 100 years.

[stylin19a]

thanks. this should pretty much kill it.

[oldbill]

“secret computer scientists”

John Podesta, Robby Mook, Donna Brazille

[oldbill]

Selective recounts is what the Supreme Court decided against in Bush v. Gore.

[Alberta's Child]

No lawyer would be able to keep a straight face while standing up in court claiming that hacking was the reason why Clinton lost a state like Wisconsin where she never made a single campaign appearance.

[mrsmith]

This is a legal way to get ‘mostly’ selective recounts!
Effectively, only machines with a paper trail will be re-counted... and they’re mostly in Trump districts.

It’s ingenious.

[arl295]

Recount:

CA
VA
NJ
NH
NM
CO
NY

Lets flush out vote fraud once and for all

[dhs12345]

I’d like to know how many non citizens voted as encouraged by President Obama?

Millions?

[dhs12345]

They tried it in FLA in 2000. Selective recounts... in only Democrat dominated areas.

[ez]

Until the Supreme Court pit the kibosh on it in Bush v Gore. With that precedent it would be pretty easy to squash a similar attempt.

[Renegade]

Clinton is toast.I voted in NE PA and the exit vote was Trump 63,Hildabeast 3 when I cast ny vote.

[PGalt]

SoreLoserwoman

Hillaryous

[mrsmith]

But they’re not requesting a selective recount. They’re requesting a general recount.
It’s just an artifact of the voting machine distribution that makes it effectively selective.

http://www.votepa.us/news/quick-facts-about-voting-systems-pennsylvania/
Has a map of voting machine types in Pa. Unverifiable ones are mostly in Philly and other Dem areas.

[PA Engineer]

The massive fraud was on the demoncrat side and DJT still won by 70k. Seems some leeches have a death wish.

I followed the returns closely. My opinion (YMMV) is the Democrats front loaded the voter fraud in Pittsburgh, Harrisburg and Philadelphia by 400,000 votes this past election.

There has been growing suspicion that these locations have been holding back in previous elections until there was a final vote tally. Precincts (59) in these areas have turned in over 110 percent voter turnout which reversed the voter trend for a Democrat victory.

To avoid a challenge, they calculated (wrongly) the margins they would need to win on the front end and left themselves only 3.7% (Philadelphia) of returns for the end of the count. In my opinion, that is why the results were skewed with Pennsylvania looking like a Trump loss most of the evening. They failed to predict the monster vote that was going to occur.

That is the main reason they held off on declaring the state a Trump victory. I believe the media was knee deep in the voter fraud. I calculated how many votes Trump would need to overcome the 3.7% holdout in Philadelphia. As soon as it was impossible to commit enough fraud, I switched to the NYT's map and watched Pennsylvania turn red. Shortly afterwards, the networks began reporting Mr. Trump had taken the state.

I agree with you. They need to go back to the immediate posting of 400,000 votes when the polls closed. That is the death wish the Democrats are toying with.

[oldenuff35]

These totally desperate souls must think that the Trump crew is reading their play book and using democrat tactics committing voter fraud...

Nope, that is the democrat way of life, and death....