Skip to comments.
A Pennsylvania recount for Hillary Clinton? A ‘nightmare scenario,’ explained (or Stein)
BillyPenn ^
| November 23, 2016
| Anna Orso
Posted on 11/24/2016 10:46:45 AM PST by bobsunshine
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 last
To: Still Thinking
Really? I am referring to the night of the election and the next day. I watched the whole fiasco into the early hours and next day. The goal for the Dems was to find 500 plus votes for Gore in said county and then call it done. First attempt reduced Bush's lead from 2000 to 500. They were selective of course. They spent hours trying to decide if hanging chads counted and running the ballots through the machines again. The goal was to call a win for Gore.
It is possible that recounts continued in other counties. That may be automatic trigger if it was close in the other countries too but it doesn't stand out.
61
posted on
11/24/2016 5:53:18 PM PST
by
dhs12345
To: PA Engineer
My opinion (YMMV) is the Democrats front loaded the voter fraud in Pittsburgh, Harrisburg and Philadelphia by 400,000 votes this past election. Back in the late 1990s I worked with a man who was deeply involved with the election process in Louisiana. He told me that the old lever-type voting machines were plaed in the precincts with enough Democrats votes pre-installed to ensure a Democrat victory.
After working with him for a couple years and finding him honest to a fault I have no doubt about his claim.
62
posted on
11/24/2016 5:55:11 PM PST
by
OldMissileer
(Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
To: bobsunshine
According to New York Magazine, that group claims it has found evidence of vote tampering and wants Clintons camp to file to recount all those millions of votes. Just the opposite is true. The "group" has stated that they have no evidence of tampering. They are saying it "could have happened".
63
posted on
11/24/2016 6:01:52 PM PST
by
2111USMC
(Aim Small Miss Small)
To: dhs12345
No, I was talking about the official court ordered recounts in the following weeks.
64
posted on
11/24/2016 6:31:22 PM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: Still Thinking
That could be. When and why did the Supreme Court step in? Seems like the FLA AG, a Republican, got involved too.
65
posted on
11/24/2016 6:42:51 PM PST
by
dhs12345
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson