The John F. Kennedy Assassination - Some Historical Perspectives

Multiple links in body of thread | Multiple

[politicianslie]

Thanks for the information, this is the same thing that happened with TWA800, cover-up by our government.

I’m sure there is an above Top Secret report that spells out what really happened.

If you can lie about killing a President in front of hundreds of people and get away with it, then hiding the truth about a few missiles hitting an airplane is child's play by comparison.

Jayna Davis was a Oklahoma City TV reporter during the OKC federal building bombing. Her book THE THIRD TERRORIST tied the OKC Muslim crowd to the OKC bombing. Timothy McVeigh was a participating patsy. The fertilizer bomb in the Ryder truck did NOT have enough explosive power to have destroyed the Federal Building. On FREEREPUBLIC a lawyer across the street said his windows were blown out but the Fed Building was seriously damaged. It was illegal to take pictures of the bomb crater, it wasn't big enough... Witnesses and a seismograph trace show there were multiple explosions.... The Muslims like to add separate explosives for added effect.

The reason I bring that up is that Jayna tied the OKC bombing to Iraqi's planted in the US. Toward the end of THIRD TERRORIST Jayna talks about a phone number she called. It went to (as I recall) a transplanted OKC Muslim. (I don't have the book available where I am now).

The bottom line is the NYC Twin tower Bomb #1, OKC Bombing, then TWA800, then African Embassy Bombings led to 9/11. Because the FEDERAL Gov't (read that Bill Clinton) did not want to admit Muslim terrorists were the causes, it propagated to 9/11. With Hussein Obama bringing in thousands and thousand, expect it to hit the fan before the Muslim cockroaches are all removed.

[politicianslie]

Just curious-how many shots do you think were fired? And from what evidence?

The public has been convinced that the BEST evidence in the JFK assassination is NOT valid.

Get out a calculator and do a simple calculation.

There are TWO time in the Zapruder film that we can say we can see reactions immediately after the shot was fired.

Zapruder frame 224 which is immediately after Connally and Kennedy have emerged from behind the Stemmons sign. At that point, Connally starts a reaction to one of the shots.

Most people agree looking at the Z film that Connally begins a reaction to a shot At frame 224.

As most know, at Zapruder frame 313 President Kennedy is shot in the head.at Z frame 313. ,

The FBI measured the Zapruder film speed by filming the second hand of a clock and counting the number of frames.

Time from frame 224 to 313 is= (313 -224)/18.3 = 4.8 seconds. When you look at the next figure, you see 4.8 seconds between shots #3 and #4.

At this point you know the time between shot #3 and shot #4 matches the time between Connally's first reaction to a shot (Frame 224) and President Kennedy being shot in the head. To get to the point where you know with near 100% assurance that the sounds of the shots were recorded, you need more matches between the Zapruder film and the acoustical evidence.

As you listen to John Connally tells you what happened when he was shot in the back, it matches one of the other three shots. Doing this kind of match for the other shots shows that all the shots in the acoustical evidence match reveals even more secrets hidden in the Zapruder film.

Connally describes what happened when he was shot in the back

Knowing the HSCA acoustical experts really did evaluate the sounds of shots allows this evidence to be used along with the Zapruder film. That allows anyone to prove what happened during the shooting.

This match between the Zapruder film and acoustical evidence analysis has never been done before. Vince Bugliosi and millions of others accepted the assertion that the sounds of the shots were NOT recorded. 4.8 seconds shows they were, more evaluation proves it.

To answer your question, the acoustical evidence proves at least five shots were fired. The acoustical evidence also gives us information on WHERE each of the shots was fired from.

If this was easy, someone else would have shown you the answers to this mystery a long time ago.

[rlmorel]

Thanks for the info...I can see the information about the fourth shot comes from the HSCA acoustical analysis done in 1979. What did you make of Vincent Bugliosi’s presentation of why that was discredited, and turned out to be an embarrassment for the HSCA? (at least that was the way that I read it)

(By the way, I saw the History Channel logo there, I have to admit, I am no fan of the History Channel. I view them as completely entertainment, a no more accurate representation of history than Oliver Stone or Michael Moore. But that is my opinion...)

[Beautiful_Gracious_Skies]

“Three of the six bums arrested were involved in the Watergate burglary.”

>And the odds of that being a coincidence are NIL.

“Idiot wind blowning thru our minds to the Capitol, it’s a wonder that we still know how to breath.”

> And 10 members of Congress take Alzheimer’s meds!

BTW the motorcycle cops tape showed the shots were fired from two directions and there were four shots not three.

> Nothing to see here, and nothing to Hear if it negates the story line.

“My position is Kennedy abandoned those brave Cubans on the beach, he got what he deserved.”

> That’s true since their family and friends in Miami were pretty d@mn celebratory of the mission accomplished in Dallas. It was originally planned for Miami Beach April 1963. A few years ago, one confessed his role while on his deathbed. [Escalante’s book]