Replies

“the SPLC doesn’t have a problem with the hate groups CAIR, the ACLU, ACORN and La Raza”

What I cannot figure out, and it really falls under the adage of “one cannot make sense of something that is inherently nonsense”, is how the SPLC doesn’t add BLM to their list of hate groups. Maybe they finally did, and I just didn’t hear about it. They DO list a group called “White Lives Matter” as a hate group, which I had never heard of, so I looked it up on the SPLC’s website, and here’s what it says:

“Meet White Lives Matter: The Racist Response to the Black Lives Matter Movement”

“Since then, the Texas-based neo-Nazi group Aryan Renaissance Society (ARS), a member of the white nationalist coalition United Aryan Front, has attempted to capitalize on this momentum by promoting WLM as “a movement dedicated to [the] promotion of the white race,” according to ARS documents.”

“While its unclear if WLM is a group attempting to create this alleged movement, claiming to have “representatives in various states” or a pet project of ARS, members of ARS encourages sympathetic whites who want to spread the WLM message to contact ARS members.”

So, it sounds like WLM isn’t even a seperate group, but rather it’s ARS members using the phrase “white lives matter” in response to the formation of the movement and group called Black Lives Matter.

Funny how (not funny as in “ha ha”) people of dark skin color involved with or inspired by the group Black Lives Matter have murdered numerous non-black skinned police officers in cold blood, shut down highways, smashed storefronts and vehicles, assaulted many people they think support Trump, and have set numerous fires in cities around the country are NOT considered a violent racist organization by the SPLC, but various rag-tag groups of white skinned morons who like to parade around giving the Hitler salute and taping up flyers stating that white lives matter, which the nightly news does NOT show committing arson, blocking highways, assaulting people, or murdering law enforcement officers, are labeled as a hate group by the SPLC.

More so, the SPLC refers to them “white nationalists”, equating the term as being racist and hateful. What I’d like to know from the SPLC, in particular from their “white” board members, is when they use their term “white nationalist” as a criteria for being listed as a “hate group”, am I by default a “hate group”? I do not associate with, or know of anybody, who gives the Hitler salute, flys a Nazi flag, or yells ‘white power’, nor do I desire to associate with them, but... my skin color is what they would call “white” and I do love my “nation” and desire to see it succeed. Do the white skinned board members of the SPLC consider themselves to be outside of their “white nationalist” criteria for haters? Or do they have self-loathing about their skin color and remorse about living in our nation, wanting citizens of other nations to succeed, even at the cost of failure for our own citizens?

I honestly do not understand how these people ‘think’. I actually pity them. Their whole world is viewed in such a way that skin color is what they first and foremost see in a human being. Perhaps the SPLC originally started out as a decent organization, fulfilling a need in our society, like labor unions did when they first started out, but also like labor unions, once the original need had been met, the problem solved, the organization and it’s members couldn’t be satisfied with accomplishing their original task, but suffered from a compulsion to revel in their victory, grow larger and more powerful, and ultimately create and become a new and more powerful source of the original problem they set out to fix: to actually become the problem. THAT is what the SPLC has now become, a sort of ever growing encyclopedic clearinghouse of divisiveness, IMHO. Perhaps that is why the FBI decided to no longer use them as a resource.