I proposed high speed rail the greeners love that, just build it elevated.
I really like both ideas.
If Babylon could have chariot races and commerce on top of its walls, why can’t we.
A wall structure large enough to have the ability to travel on top would be multi-purpose.
However, while entirely politically incorrect, in light of the 120,000 people (many innocent) purportedly killed across northern states of Mexico by lawless cartels and corrupt authorities, **without advocating statehood in this territory, in order to eliminate the problems, I would insist on drawing the wall line from the Big Bend in Texas to Quaymas, Mexico, (where we once held), and rejecting the Gadsden compromise (in part agreed to as a gesture from the US to Mexico City based on Mexico’s agreement not to cause further bloodshed on our border or weaken our border. The government of Mexico has consistently violated this agreement.
Mexico (or influential elements within Mexico) have consistently been allied with some of our worst enemies (Communist’s/Nazi’s/Muslim Brotherhood), and blatantly encouraged the violation of our immigration laws to weaken us, as well as encouraging every sort of violence and corruption along and within our border. Mexicans and Americans have been brutally killed.
Our military could make quick work of these thugs if allowed. I would not even tip them off we were coming. It would be a high speed take down of all corrupt authorities and cartels from every direction. I would not even let them escape to the south. I believe many truly oppressed people in these northern Mexican states would rejoice.
While I like dreaming a little, bet I would never be called a “dreamer” by a liberal!
Additionally, this would give the US maritime authority through the Gulf of California, and shorten the length of the wall.