Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerClaws

Not a single exculpatory fact is listed other than their denial, and numerous suspicious facts are omitted. Just to name one, the revolting pedo worship artwork on the walls of that place is simply described as ‘modernist’.


33 posted on 11/21/2016 7:57:23 PM PST by Company Man (God has blessed America, again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Company Man
Most of this evidence of child trafficking involves words and symbols and what they mean. It would not have taken the reporter much effort to contact the FBI and one of their child trafficking units, met with a detective, showed them the words and symbols and asked them if they mean something in the context of child trafficking. If the FBI had said no, they don't mean anything sinister, I would be satisfied. That is pretty basic journalism. But they didn't do that.

Right now the online explanation seem to be an explanation of what those words and symbols mean. If there is an alternative explanation, I'd like to hear it. This article doesn't even try.

61 posted on 11/21/2016 8:21:36 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Company Man

Do you know where that artwork is posted?


116 posted on 11/21/2016 11:23:07 PM PST by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson