Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former CEO of UBS And Credit Suisse: "Central Banks Are Past The Point Of No Return (trunk)"
Zero Hedge ^ | 20 November 2016 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 11/21/2016 5:45:13 PM PST by Lorianne

Sounding more like a "tinfoil" blog than the former CEO of the two largest Swiss banks, Grübel warned that central banks have "crossed the point of no return" which will ultimately “end in a crash."

Joining Deutsche Bank in slamming NIRP, Grubel said that banks are losing hundreds of millions of francs each year to negative interest rates paid to central banks.

Worse, he warned that central banks will eventually lose their credibility in the markets but that this could take 10 years or more, at which point it will "all end in a crash." What happens then? The former CEO believes that the final outcome will be wholesale financial nationalization: “after that all banks could belong to the state”

Grubel also the doubted the wisdom of the Swiss National Bank’s balance sheet: "the Swiss National Bank's balance sheet now accounts for 100 percent of GDP. Japan is also 100%, but mainly invested in its own state paper. The ECB and the Fed are 30%. Switzerland is far, far, far ahead. Is that wise?"

The former CEO also touched on a point we have made ever since 2010 when we said that in a world of unprecedented political polarity, politicians now control the world almost exclusively through monetary policy, to wit: "After the financial crisis, politics has taken power in the banking sector: It has bound the banks into a regulatory corset and now they can no longer move. Politicians have told central banks: now you determine what is going on with the economy."

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/21/2016 5:45:13 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Page Not Found
2 posted on 11/21/2016 5:51:04 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

iow, yea it’s a shell game


3 posted on 11/21/2016 5:51:22 PM PST by aces ( Islam is the religion of the dead, Got Jesus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
HA HA, that bailout from killing Assad and seizing the Russian assets just never materialized

the little bailout from doing the drive-by on Ghadaffi sure didnt go far

4 posted on 11/21/2016 5:53:13 PM PST by KTM rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-20/former-ceo-ubs-and-credit-suisse-central-banks-are-past-point-not-return-it-will-all


5 posted on 11/21/2016 5:59:25 PM PST by mvonfr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-20/former-ceo-ubs-and-credit-suisse-central-banks-are-past-point-not-return-it-will-all


6 posted on 11/21/2016 6:04:10 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Drudge has a story indicating that CitiBank, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America arein trouble, as well. Plenty of available rooftops available, bankers...no waiting.


7 posted on 11/21/2016 6:05:50 PM PST by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aces

ALL BANKS in a Credit Money, Debt Based Currency are Shell Games by Definition.


8 posted on 11/21/2016 6:45:48 PM PST by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
The correct link for the main article
9 posted on 11/21/2016 7:03:30 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Congress needs to spend some time re-writing the Federal Reserve Act. Over the past seven or eight years the Federal Reserve has assumed powers never anticipated by Congress. Allowing them to build a long-term asset portfolio of over 3 trillion dollars, financed almost entirely by overnight deposits at commercial banks, is insanity.

The Fed is now running the largest positive carry trade of all time. It loses big if they allow interest rates to rise to “normal” levels, so they have a clear conflict of interest in allowing that to happen.

This is an area that Trump really hasn’t weighed in on yet and it will be interesting to see where he comes down on it when he finally does.


10 posted on 11/21/2016 7:43:28 PM PST by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norseman
Very instructional comments on a very obscure but important issue. Most like me self dont trust or understand the fed.
11 posted on 11/21/2016 8:10:26 PM PST by Awgie (Truth is always stranger than fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Awgie

Thank you. One of the true risks the Trump administration faces is an unwinding of recent Fed policy. The Fed has always been able to manipulate short-term interest rates to whatever level they want to achieve, but only recently have they sought to directly influence long-term interest rates. To do so, they had to implement massive purchase programs of long-term Treasury bonds and mortgage paper.

However, if the market decides that the whole thing is a shell game (and it is), then even though short rates might still be constrained by the Fed, long rates could rise significantly, and without regard to what the Fed desires.

Two things will happen then. First, the Fed’s own long-term bond portfolio will suffer tremendous losses, losses that will directly impact taxpayers. Second, the cost of borrowing by the Treasury will escalate quickly. A one percent increase in cost on $20 trillion would increase the annual federal budget deficit by $200 billion and the rise could easily be twice that or more in just the first half of Trump’s four-year term.

And if things really get out of hand, with the bond market panicking due to the increased deficit, rates could jump far higher, raising the deficit by a trillion or more dollars per year. That is the risk that the combination of Obama’s reckless spending and the Fed’s ridiculous interest rate policy have bestowed upon the nation, and the incoming administration.

The only way I see out of it is to put policies in place that generate extremely rapid economic growth while cutting the federal spending enough to reduce the federal deficit to near zero, or even to a modest surplus. “Drain the Swamp” would be a good start, along with favorable tax policies. I’m assuming that the “drain the swamp” part would cut the regulatory burden dramatically.


12 posted on 11/21/2016 8:47:04 PM PST by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

yep, we need the Lord...our reality is lacking direction


13 posted on 11/22/2016 3:00:47 AM PST by aces ( Islam is the religion of the dead, Got Jesus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson