If you are not a nationalist, then you are a globalist — meaning an advocate of a one-world government, with individual nations being merely administrative sub-districts of the global government.
People need to think about what that means. Would it be a system where each country gets to vote for the world government representatives and executive officers, and whichever candidate(s) wins the most country votes wins?
And would there be a world legislature where each country gets a certain number of representatives based on its population? And then would the individual countries be bound by the laws and regulations imposed by the UN?
Or would there be a world-wide popular vote for chief elected officials? Imagine America, with its 300 million citizens, voting in a world where it can be outvoted by every other counter — and where countries like China and Indian would have billions of voters.
Would anyone expect such a system to produce anything but corruption and tyranny? Such tyranny would stand until the whole system collapsed from the inevitable utter economic destruction that always follows Utopian oligarchies.
The fact is, if you are a globalist who is against nationalism, then you are by definition an enemy of the United States — an enemy that advocates, promotes and fights against the “supreme law of the land” which is the American Constitution.
Thus, if you are a globalist, you are automatically disqualified from being President of the United States, even if you cynically and dishonestly take the oath of office to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.
If you are not a nationalist, then you are a globalist....
You mean like the Clintons and their Clinton Global Initiative?