Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The face of defeat: A weary-looking Hillary Clinton makes her first appearance since ...
(UK) Daily Mail ^ | November 16, 2016 | Francesca Chambers

Posted on 11/16/2016 9:11:46 PM PST by Zakeet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-230 next last
To: Will J Diamond

Who asked me previously to provide a source? You?

Link, please.


201 posted on 11/18/2016 7:16:11 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
There’s no similar mythology associated with Hillary. She’s merely a malignant tumor.

Excise the tumor from the body politic.

202 posted on 11/18/2016 7:21:29 PM PST by Professional Engineer (I'll go with a 40 or 45. That 44 is for wimps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Will J Diamond

Incidentally, your assertion in this post is a wholesale lie. If you’re going to post to/about me, at least post the truth.


203 posted on 11/18/2016 7:28:32 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Professional Engineer

For close to eight years, I was convinced no one could be worse, as POTUS, than Obama. After seeing more of Hillary, I honestly believe she’d have surpassed him in damage to the country. I thank God Trump defeated her. And I agree with your characterization completely.


204 posted on 11/18/2016 7:32:16 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Will J Diamond

You idolize the wrong people. How did your hero worship of Nate Silver work out?

You promote the wrong news sources, too. Neither the NYT nor the Washington Post provides objective news coverage. Even average, non-political types have figured this out. Only Leftist trolls/Obots continue to argue in defense of those rags.


205 posted on 11/18/2016 7:58:33 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

Comment #206 Removed by Moderator

To: Will J Diamond

WOW!!! So you ARE a retread! You were active on the site all the way back to ‘13!!

I’ve asked before, but you are shy, so I’ll ask again. Who were you originally? For what cause were you banned? What motivated you to suddenly create a new ID?

Two points, neither of which will you comprehend. First, you are an Obot. That’s not merely a manufactured term; it has a meaning. In this case, it means that you’ll believe Obama’s lies over against all evidence. That’s what Obots do. They disregard facts and evidence in favor of their favorite presupposition: Obama is honest.

Secondly, you LIED.

In case you missed it, YOU LIED.

You said I’ve never answered the question re Obama’s claim of a Kenyan birth. But I answered it in the very link you provided.

Which makes you a LIAR.

You are a lying liar. No surprise; that’s what Obots do. Like their idol, Obama, they lie.

Liar.


207 posted on 11/19/2016 4:41:48 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

hmmm.... lying liar

somewhere in the speech of a lying liar is truth


208 posted on 11/19/2016 4:45:10 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Does America still have lots of safe closet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: bert

Would you prefer the term, ‘pathological liar.’ I have never encountered an Obot that didn’t lie pathologically. This is because they are arguing the premise that Obama is honest. Yet Obama himself is a pathological liar. It turns out, when you spend your time arguing that a pathological liar is truthful, you become a pathological liar yourself.


209 posted on 11/19/2016 4:59:42 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Yes, pathological liar feels good to me


210 posted on 11/19/2016 5:02:36 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Does America still have lots of safe closet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: bert

That’s good. I’ll use that term in the future, or perhaps, ‘chronic liar.’ With Obama, lying is a full blown pathology. For those whose Internet job is arguing that Obama is fundamentally honest and truthful, lying becomes by necessity chronic, though it can be argued that it doesn’t rise to the clinical definition of pathological.


211 posted on 11/19/2016 5:20:29 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: stanne

Mao Tee Ting? Is he related to Sum Ting Wong?


212 posted on 11/19/2016 5:48:39 AM PST by freedomlover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #213 Removed by Moderator

To: Will J Diamond

I answered the Obot in question, re your ‘13 link. If you are too blinded by Obama-love—or simply not intelligent enough—to comprehend the answer, how is that my problem???

If you had one honest bone in your body, you would copy or paraphrase/synopsize my answer, and then dispute it. But this is beyond your meagre ability.

While you’re frantically avoiding the reply I provided to Bigguy, here’s a question for you—Obot shill that you are. Which of these two statements is true: A, Obama is fundamentally honest and truthful, or B, Obama is fundamentally a lying, dishonest, untrustworthy individual.

A or B, Obot; A or B.


214 posted on 11/19/2016 7:34:17 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

Comment #215 Removed by Moderator

To: freedomlover

Thats when i disabled autocorrect.

But now i want it back. Cant remember how j fid it


216 posted on 11/19/2016 9:52:16 AM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Will J Diamond

All lies. Like the true Leftist Obot shill you arrle, all you have is lies.

Well, lies and grade school immaturity. Your attempted taunts sound like they came from a ten-yo. No wonder you can’t answer a simple question about Obama. You’re still at an emotional age where you picture him as a superhero.

Sad.


217 posted on 11/19/2016 10:01:55 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

arrle = are


218 posted on 11/19/2016 11:14:29 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Will J Diamond

While you’re pondering the mystery of Obama’s fundamental nature, here’s another question for you. Why do you react to every situation like a doctrinaire Leftist?

For example, you defend the integrity of both the NYT and the WaPo. Only a hardcore Leftist does that. For an example of how a conservative characterizes those two rags, see the following text:

David A. Clarke, Jr.: The next positive thing @nytimes @washingtonpost says about a Donald Trump cabinet nominee will be the first. Haters gonna hate.


219 posted on 11/19/2016 2:35:10 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Will J Diamond
Here's another sweet tweet for you. Savor!

Bill Mitchell ‏@mitchellvii

Oh noooz! Liberal Truth Squads! I'm sooooo skeeered. Wonder if this will be as effective as Hillary's inept Twitter trolls?

220 posted on 11/19/2016 3:02:24 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson