Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: meadsjn
Your interpretation of rights coincides exactly with the communist liberal Democrats.

I have a broad interpretation of Free Speech rights. Always have. When Democrats claimed Donald Trump should be tried for treason for saying that he hoped the Russians would release whatever info they had, I supported Free Speech. When Democrats claimed that Donald Trump threatened Mrs. Clinton when he said we ought to see what happens when Mrs. Clinton doesn't have Secret Service protection, I supported Free Speech.

I honestly believe too many Americans support Free Speech only when it is in their political interest to do so. It is my belief that this is what we're seeing on FR.

88 posted on 11/16/2016 10:12:26 AM PST by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: SSS Two
Harassment and threats are not free speech protected by the constitution.

This is the part you simply do not understand. You are wrong; dead wrong.

89 posted on 11/16/2016 10:14:13 AM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson