Bizarre. I'm saying there is no evidence of threats or intimidation, therefore it is inappropriate to claim a crime has been committed. (At least one elector says there has been no intimidation.)
Due to the lack of evidence, I assume that there was no crime. You take the opposite position. There is no evidence, therefore it is a crime. "Go back to DU"? This is what concerns me about what FR has become.
Bid deal.
ONE elector says.......
Proves nothing.
And you have NO evidence for what you are claiming either. So you are condemning others for doing the very thing you yourself are doing.
That makes you a hypocrite.
Then leave already if you don’t like it.
It’s not your website and you don’t get to make the rules.
The First Amendment restricts the federal government, it does not restrict the people. People are free to do what they want with their own property.