Skip to comments.
Federal Spending Reduction Ideas for Pres. Trump
Cato ^
| November 10, 2016 3:18PM
| Chris Edwards
Posted on 11/16/2016 3:51:59 AM PST by expat_panama
President-elect Donald Trump said on the campaign trail that he will balance the federal budget and cut wasteful spending. Here are some of Trumps views on budget reforms:
- We are going to ask every department head in government to provide a list of wasteful spending projects that we can eliminate in my first 100 days. Source.
- We can also stop funding programs that are not authorized in law. Congress spent $320 billion last year on 256 expired laws
Removing just 5 percent of that will reduce spending by almost $200 billion over a ten-year period. Source.
- I may cut Department of Education. I believe Common Core is a very bad thing, Trump said. I believe that we should be you know, educating our children from Iowa, from New Hampshire, from South Carolina, from California, from New York. I think that it should be local education. Source.
- If we save just one penny of each federal dollar spent on non-defense, and non-entitlement programs, we can save almost $1 trillion over the next decade. Source.
- Were going local. Have to go local. Environmental protectionwe waste all of this money. Were going to bring that back to the states
We are going to cut many of the agencies, we will balance our budget, and we will be dynamic again. Source.
- Waste, fraud and abuse all over the place. Waste, fraud and abuse. You look at whats happening with Social Security, you looklook at whats happening with every agencywaste, fraud and abuse. We will cut so much, your head will spin. Source.
I hope my head does spin from cuts, although most of Trumps proposals are vague and quite timid. Still, Im hoping that the more the incoming president finds out about the federal budget, the more he will appreciate the need for major terminations.
So let me suggest some wasteful spending that the new administration should tackle, and the annual savings from terminating each:
- K-12 school subsidies, which generate bureaucracy and stifle innovation ($25 billion).
- Farm subsidies, which enrich wealthy landowners and harm the environment ($25 billion).
- Rural corporate welfare, which is handed out by the Department of Agriculture ($6 billion).
- Energy subsidies, which have been one boondoggle after another ($5 billion).
- TSA airport screening, which Trump has said is a total disaster ($5 billion).
- The war on drugs, which wastes police resources and generates violence ($15 billion).
- Excess pay for federal workers, especially gold-plated retirement benefits ($33 billion with a 10 percent cut).
- Housing subsidies, which distort markets and damage cities ($37 billion).
- Community development aid, which is corporate welfare used for buying votes ($11 billion).
- Urban transit and passenger rail funding, which are properly local and private activities ($12 billion).
- Obamacare exchange subsidies and Medicaid expansion, which should be repealed along with the overall law ($225 billion a year by 2026).
President Trump will face major budget pressures in coming years as deficits and entitlement spending soar. Todays $600 billion deficits are headed toward $1 trillion, and deficits will be even higher if a recession comes along.
Federal spending cuts would help avert a fiscal crisis and boost growth by reducing economic distortions. The incoming Trump team should start with some of the cuts here, and there are plenty more proposals at DownsizingGovernment.org.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; investing; spending
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: GailA
Maybe 2017 would be a great time for the line item veto...
To: expat_panama
42
posted on
11/16/2016 6:24:27 AM PST
by
GailA
(Ret. SCPO wife: A politician that won't keep his word to Veterans/Military won't keep them to You!)
To: expat_panama
Maybe 2017 would be a great time for the line item veto... Tried under Clinton and ruled unconstitutional.
To: Pollster1
I’d add in all PRE K schools, they are noting but Fed/State $$ paid babysitters.
44
posted on
11/16/2016 6:28:28 AM PST
by
GailA
(Ret. SCPO wife: A politician that won't keep his word to Veterans/Military won't keep them to You!)
To: GailA
Id add in all PRE K schools, they are noting but Fed/State $$ paid babysitters. I'd agree at the federal level. If a state wants to do that, they are entitled to do so. The federal government isn't because it's not an enumerated power.
45
posted on
11/16/2016 6:30:56 AM PST
by
Pollster1
("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
To: Pollster1
46
posted on
11/16/2016 6:56:32 AM PST
by
GailA
(Ret. SCPO wife: A politician that won't keep his word to Veterans/Military won't keep them to You!)
To: expat_panama
And in other news, Mount Everest will be moved to make way for low cost housing for Maldive Islanders whose islands have been submerged due to climate caused rising sea levels. /sarc
To: expat_panama
48
posted on
11/16/2016 7:12:32 AM PST
by
WayneS
(An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
To: zek157
Excellent post! Big medicine in my area is deeply entrenched; it is wide and it is deep. And everyone involved loves it, users and providers both. It is the very best, the top of the line. Any reining in would be stymied from minute one. It is literally sacrosanct.
To: cweese
Thanks for the info. I have not seen that graphic before.
50
posted on
11/16/2016 7:46:26 AM PST
by
cweese
(Hook 'em Horns!!!)
To: expat_panama; All
“We will cut so much, your head will spin.
While ours may spin, I’m looking FORWARD to the Socialist heads that actually EXPLODE! President-Elect (LOVE THAT!) Trump needs to talk to us every WEEK about what he is cutting. He needs to lay it out that our Nation has a BUDGET just like each and every American Citizen.
However, brace yourselves for a LOT of...
Trump HATES Children!
Trump HATES Old People!
Trump HATE Sick People!
Trump HATES Blacks!
Trump HATES YOU!
...24/7/365 for the next four/eight years. :)
51
posted on
11/16/2016 7:49:36 AM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
To: WayneS
...line item veto?It's the idea that Prez should be able to veto part of a bill and sign the rest.
What we had all this time is that when congress sent a bill for signature w/ important stuff like defense and the dems tagged on cr@p for abortion at the end of it, so if there was a veto the dems cud say the prez hates defense. Theoretically there's nothing to prevent the prez from just vetoing the bad part and signing the good --but for 200 years it's never happened because neither side wants the other to get it next term when the 'outs' become 'ins'.
Fast forward to 2016 and O has just spent 8 years doing anything he wants --imho T has nothing to lose by going for the line item starting 2017 because we now know the dems will do it anyway if they feel like it anyway.
No more pork snuck in w/ something needed.
To: WomBom
The Cato Institute is a Libertarian think tank, which explains their view on President-Elect (LOVE THAT!) Trump.
53
posted on
11/16/2016 7:52:57 AM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
"--brace yourselves for a LOT of... Trump HATES--"The beauty is that it's what they're already saying, so this time no one will ever notice any difference ;)
To: stockpirate
The Cato Institute is Libertarian. They don’t like Hillary!, either.
55
posted on
11/16/2016 7:55:21 AM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
To: expat_panama
56
posted on
11/16/2016 7:58:48 AM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
To: DoodleDawg; WayneS
line item veto... Tried under Clinton and ruled unconstitutional.
Dang --nobody tells me anything around here! Tx fer the headsup, here's the story:
Court Strikes Down Line-Item Veto
...Within a couple of hours of the ruling, the law's backers announced they will try again to find a constitutional way to expand the president's powers to cut pork-barrel expenditures. In a 6 to 3 decision, the court held that the line-item veto law violates a constitutional requirement that legislation be passed by both houses of Congress and presented in its entirety to the president for signature or veto... ...Clinton, who had line-item veto powers as governor of Arkansas, signed the bill with relish and moved quickly, although cautiously, to begin trimming spending bills... ...Congress could alter the president's role in determining the final text of a law only by constitutional amendment... ...they will introduce legislation immediately to get around the Supreme Court's objections by breaking each appropriations bill into individual items, passing each one separately ...not a dime's worth of difference between Congress authorizing the president to cancel a spending item, and Congress's authorizing money to be spent on a particular item at the president's discretion. And the latter has been done since the founding of the nation," said Scalia. |
To: expat_panama
That's what I meant by "What line item veto?"
And I am okay with the president not having line-tem veto power, because... ...democrats.
However, I do think we need a constitutional amendment which sets the maximum length of each new federal law to the total number of words included in the original text of the Constitution (pre-Bill of Rights, although I'm flexible on this point").
;-)
58
posted on
11/16/2016 8:30:26 AM PST
by
WayneS
(An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
To: DoodleDawg
It would save $8.2 billion this past year. That's a rounding error for the budget as a whole. Think of it this way. How many employees of the EPA, or contractors to it, or grant recipients, are conservatives? Practically zero. It is only 8 billion, but it is 8 billion that hurts them more than us.
We haven't won yet, we are just getting in a position to win. We win when they have no more money, and no more people to fight back.
To: expat_panama
NPR, PBS should be first rounders.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson