Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eric Holder: "Abolish The Electoral College"
Real Clear Politics ^ | November 12, 2016 | Ian Schwartz

Posted on 11/12/2016 6:50:03 AM PST by C19fan

Former Attorney General Eric Holder joins Bill Maher to discuss the aftermath of Donald Trump's election and calls for the abolition of the Electoral College.

Holder said the U.S. should elect presidents via popular vote instead of through electoral votes. The former attorney general said there is a simple solution, "we have to just abolish the electoral college."

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anticonstitution; constitution; electoral; electoralcollege; holder; liberalagenda; liberalfascism; potus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 next last
To: Haiku Guy

Which must include removing ALL non citizens from our voter rolls (both legal and illegal aliens) and keeping them off. Hillary only “won” the popular vote due to massive illegal voting by non citizens!

http://dennismichaellynch.com/obama-tells-illegal-dreamer-ok-vote/

Trump and Congress can and should fix this at the Federal Level, in the first 100 days, especially with all the crying about his “losing” the popular vote. Trump actually won the popular vote of Citizens! You don’t win over 300 electoral votes without also winning the popular vote without massive fraud in the loser’s states!

In previous occasions when the popular vote winner lost the electoral college vote, the electoral college winner narrowly won the electoral college (Bush in 2000 had only 271 after Florida - Trump has 306 in comparison)!

Congress has the authority to establish the time, place and manner for Federal elections. This would include ordering state elections offices to remove non citizens from their voter rolls and keeping them off in the future by nationally requiring proof of citizenship for all new voter registrations in every state!


121 posted on 11/12/2016 9:02:08 AM PST by dsm69 (Boycott News Media/Hollywood Advertisers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I have heard of this bill but don’t believe this was a amendment to the Constitution?


122 posted on 11/12/2016 9:06:47 AM PST by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

They do lie...


123 posted on 11/12/2016 9:17:20 AM PST by DoughtyOne (The morning and the evening were the election day. People voted. The Lord saw, and it was good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

One county, one vote.


124 posted on 11/12/2016 9:18:09 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Holder is an ignoramus.

He is also a depraved monster who hatched a plan which depended upon the murder of random innocent persons.


125 posted on 11/12/2016 9:30:17 AM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Yes, we want a President only New York and California approve of.


126 posted on 11/12/2016 9:32:34 AM PST by depressed in 06 (If you like your part-time job, you can keep your part-time job. Vote Bolshecrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Hey Eric... SO CLOSE to becoming a SCOTUS Judge.... and the opportunity was just snatched from you... HHHAHHHAHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHAH


127 posted on 11/12/2016 9:33:37 AM PST by Lazamataz (TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Tagline...
128 posted on 11/12/2016 9:46:35 AM PST by Kickass Conservative ( Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Its true that Trump did not win the popular vote. But he did not try to either. If it were a popular vote that mattered there would have been rallies and ads in California and New York. And Trump would have won the popular vote. But as that was not required, Trump did not do it.

Trump spent his time out in states that mattered and Hillary spent her time in mansions of the rich and famous collecting money. And in the end, Trump is President Elect, and Hillary is not.

But if people are saying that Trump and Republicans are a minority party, they have only to look at the state legislatures (68 out of 99), governor-ships (34 out of 50),The US House of Representatives(239 out of 436), and US Senate (52 out of 100) to figure out where the electorate is. The country is republican. And they live and vote local.


129 posted on 11/12/2016 9:47:41 AM PST by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

One of THE very first subversives the new DOJ needs to examine.


130 posted on 11/12/2016 9:47:42 AM PST by HangUpNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

ABOLISH EARLY VOTING.


131 posted on 11/12/2016 10:07:15 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan; thecodont

Thank you both!

Makes sense to me. So does the Electoral college.

I wonder, how many illegals voted? Someone mentioned 1.6 million? Encouraged to do so by the big Zero? How many for Hillary? Throw those votes out.

How much vote fraud occurred? We have no clue, but I’ll estimate at least 250,000 votes on the Democrat side, what with all the magical vote changing machines and secret vote manufacturing rooms in Broward county, and the early and often types. Factor these out and she lost both the electoral and popular vote.


132 posted on 11/12/2016 10:45:37 AM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Do we know this guy!!? How do we forget Obama’s gun runner head of the DoJ. The one that caused the US Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry children to grow up without a father. The federal operation dubbed Fast and Furious for which he walked away from unscathed.


133 posted on 11/12/2016 10:59:35 AM PST by wideyed (Tom B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wideyed

What a useless affirmative-action hire. Shouldn’t this bum and criminal be in prison for his many crimes?


134 posted on 11/12/2016 11:02:25 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
The three-fifths compromise originated in the Confederation Congress, as a formula for calculating how much tax the states owed to the central government. The idea was that a slave was only 60% as productive as a free person.

Since slaves had no rights, they should not have been counted as all (any more than "Indians not taxed" were) but the compromise was made to win the support of the states with large slave populations for the Constitution.

135 posted on 11/12/2016 11:26:54 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: poinq

Excellant point! If the game was to be played to win primarily the popular vote verses the electoral vote then presidential campaign strategies would be very different. Therefore it is a total red-herring to make anything at all of the popular vote. Trump beat 17 primary republican candidates and the democrat machine/media backed candidate. I believe if his focus was simply on the popular vote he could have easily employed a different campaign strategy and won that instead. The electoral college serves a very different constitutional purpose which is to level the playing field for the many smaller states verses the larger states. This has been well explained by many, but to think the popular vote in and of itself trumps the electoral vote the rules being what they are is naive.


136 posted on 11/12/2016 11:39:05 AM PST by markman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Popular vote would be VERY unbalanced.

Just dole out free barrels of whiskey and recreational marijuana in heavily populated areas!

137 posted on 11/12/2016 11:53:39 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: markman46

Click on the link and learn more about it. It is not an amendment to the Constitution. It uses the compact provisions between the states to circumvent the Electoral College.


138 posted on 11/12/2016 12:04:06 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

It was done less for taxation purposes and more for representation in government purposes.

The compromise was made because slave states wanted slaves to count 100%, which would have given them more representation in congress.

Anti-slavery states said they should count as 0%, since they could not vote.

The two issues, taxation and representation were both linked to the counted population, but taxation was not on the mind of the anti-slavery people. Not to say taxation wasn’t part of it, but it was far from foremost as the driving force in the compromise.

It was all about representation in Congress, not about taxation, even though the two are linked. The anti-slavery states did not want the slave-holding states to have (to them) an artificially high level of legislative power assigned to them simply because they had slaves, which would have given them reason to have even more.


139 posted on 11/12/2016 12:04:14 PM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: WomBom

SC is now my home. Moved here when I retired, haven’t looked back. Wonderful place. However, wish there were fewer blue Yankees.


140 posted on 11/12/2016 12:26:11 PM PST by upchuck (Obama once thought that he belonged to the ages. Now he belongs in the rubbish bin. h/t D.Greenfield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson