Skip to comments.
FBI ran 23 child porn sites in sting operation
The Hill ^
| 11 Nov 2016
| Ali Breland
Posted on 11/11/2016 11:45:02 AM PST by Theoria
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
To: Electric Graffiti
Prison is inadequate to ensure zero-recidivism; I suggest public hanging.
To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Even text has been determined to be CP. A convicted child molester was on probation and had kept a journal of his fantasies, without acting on them. Because he was on probation, his writings were determined to be CP and illegal, though had someone else written them, they would not. That's messed up -- if that were a valid thing to prosecute over, then murder-mystery authors are liable to be prosecuted for murder. It utterly fails to distinguish action from fantasy/temptation and therefore has zero basis in reality. (What would be even more messed up is if seeing a shrink regularly were a condition of the probation, and the shrink instructed him to keep said journal.)
To: Boogieman
63
posted on
11/11/2016 1:58:47 PM PST
by
Louis Foxwell
( Trump is the collective voice of 100 million F U Â’s.)
To: LouAvul
GO LOU!!!
Nearing 70 here, so I guess I’m just a kid. :)
Have a great day.
64
posted on
11/11/2016 2:34:01 PM PST
by
JohnnyP
(Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
To: Louis Foxwell
I don’t see it as any different then undercover police. It’s just in the cyber world.
65
posted on
11/11/2016 3:19:12 PM PST
by
b4me
(Idolatry is rampant in thoughts and actions. Choose whom you will serve....)
To: Mr. Douglas
created a copy of the screen image and emailed it to myself That there could be troublesome. Emailing it is transporting it elsewhere, depending on content could be a crime more so than simply looking at it.
66
posted on
11/11/2016 3:35:38 PM PST
by
roadcat
To: Mr. Douglas
Yep. It means they were actually breaking the law - exploiting children with the type of material that makes such sites illegal. And they, themselves were exposed to it. Yes, I find the whole notion that the FBI is running child porn sites to be quite a bit disturbing. How much child porn is on the internet due to the FBI putting it there? How much is the FBI putting back in circulation? Don't the victims have the right to not have their images used as honeypots in sting operations?
67
posted on
11/11/2016 3:47:59 PM PST
by
Drew68
("They don't know how to win -- I will teach them!" --President-elect Donald J. Trump)
To: Theoria
68
posted on
11/11/2016 4:25:09 PM PST
by
Chode
(You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience, NOTHING! ich bin ein Deplorable...)
To: roadcat
It was a screen image of the google search, with the link colored purple to show I clicked on it. It was just a list of sites returned from a google search. And in the screen shot you can see that it was even labelled as a form of SharePoint help.
No shots of the actual site. That would be crazy. :-D
69
posted on
11/12/2016 6:27:29 AM PST
by
Mr. Douglas
(Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
