So - he ended up running four years TOO LATE, darn it all!
That is a heck of an interesting analysis. Very impressive and very surprising.
Hasn’t that been our point all along to the GOPe - We need a candidate that boldly stands for a difference - not Democrat -lite?
Romney would have beaten 0bama in 2012 if he ran a much more careful and directed campaign. He took the gloves off at some point, perhaps out of fear of losing his “nice guy” image-—after he was just a vicious, remorseless scumbag to his Repub co-candidates in the primaries. That election was his to win as there was plenty of dissatisfaction with 0bama. But he consistently eased off his message and attack, surrounded as he was with the usual sycophants.
We weren’t facing the dire consequences then we are now. Donald Duck could have beaten Hillary and Trump made it close.
I think Trump has been studying the whole process for the last 8 years....if not longer.
In 2016 he is focused....sharp....and devastating.
Under budget and ahead of schedule.
bookmark for future study
Wow. This had to hurt Nat Disgrace to write.
GOPe would not have gone for Trump in 2012, and we did not know that many candidates were GOPe planted false flag tea-partiers.
Alberta gives important caveats in the title and the article and it is an interesting article. But if Donald Trump had been the GOP nominee in 2012, the actual election results would not necessarily be what the NR article calculates using 2016 data.
The author forgot to mention that Hillary Clinton lost Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania by a total of 107,000 votes.
107,000 more votes - and Clinton would have been elected president in 2016.