Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/09/2016 3:43:18 PM PST by smokingfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: smokingfrog

Bookmark


2 posted on 11/09/2016 3:45:02 PM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Tim Kreepy Klown Kaine: “She won the popular vote!”

Yeah, and I drank more beer than both Hillary and Trump last night, so I want to be President.


3 posted on 11/09/2016 3:46:17 PM PST by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Zactly.

The Electoral College evens the playing field by apportionment.


4 posted on 11/09/2016 3:46:45 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Hillary’s ground game wasn’t quite what it was cracked up to be.


5 posted on 11/09/2016 3:47:36 PM PST by HotKat (Politicians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

She said we are a constitutional democracy for a reason. She is going to use majority vote as a club.


7 posted on 11/09/2016 3:52:09 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
It just means they stuffed the wrong ballot boxes


8 posted on 11/09/2016 3:53:13 PM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
Irrelevant??

Irrelevant my ass!

It is relevant because it demonstrates that the founding fathers knew what they were doing when they wrote the Constitution.

They knew that some day the cities would become so large that only a few major cities would control the elections and had the wisdom and the experience with Europe to understand the dangers.

We should give thanks to the founders that we do not have Hillary for our next president.

10 posted on 11/09/2016 3:55:39 PM PST by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

What about the 60,000 felons that were allowed to vote in Virginia? What about other shenanigans that the Democrats may have perpetrated to get votes for Hillary? If she got more of the popular vote, I’ll bet they weren’t legal votes.


12 posted on 11/09/2016 4:00:30 PM PST by murron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Popular vote? Which party holds more governorships, state legislative bodies and both houses and now the presidency? I’d say the morning POPULAR one.


16 posted on 11/09/2016 4:02:51 PM PST by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
Your candidate got more of the popular vote? Irrelevant.

Also Bullshiit.

17 posted on 11/09/2016 4:03:07 PM PST by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
This does not mean, however, that Clinton would necessarily have prevailed in an election that was determined solely by the popular vote. This is because the popular vote total is itself a product of the electoral college system. As a consequence, we do not know what the result would have been under a popular vote system, let alone whether Clinton would have prevailed.

Good point. People who don't live in swing states assume that their votes don't matter so they may not vote.

The author also says that campaigns don't go out of their way to get votes in safe states or discourage votes from the other side in such states.

That's true, but in much of the country voters in deeply red or blue states may see the commercials broadcast to or from or for the swing states. There's a spill-over effect. It doesn't change the validity of his case, though.

24 posted on 11/09/2016 4:14:04 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Has anyone found the actual numbers? Most sites won’t even report that Trump hit 306 electoral votes. He may have won the popular vote by now.


26 posted on 11/09/2016 4:25:26 PM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Comrade Hellry and Owl Gore - forever linked together.


27 posted on 11/09/2016 4:27:09 PM PST by newfreep ("If Lyin' Ted was an American citizen, he would be a traitor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

My understanding (and I may be wrong here) is that some states stop counting when the remaining ballots are not enough to affect the outcome. Hence, the actual popular vote can not be really known.


28 posted on 11/09/2016 4:28:58 PM PST by sima_yi ( Reporting live from the far North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
This election demonstrates exactly why the Electoral College is in place. Currently Hillary leads Trump in the national vote by approximately 200,000, however her lead in California is 2.5 million votes. What that means is that subtracting California Trump lead the popular vote in the rest of the country by 2.3 million. Should California be able to pick the President by itself? Clearly that's not what the founders intended as the President is supposed to represent all of the people throughout the country.

As has been correctly pointed out, because we operate under an Electoral system, a vote for Trump in a deep blue state like California or Massachusetts doesn't mean much so voters who might turn out for Trump under a pure popular vote system might not. So arguments about the raw vote totals are not germane as that's not the system being measured.

29 posted on 11/09/2016 4:29:07 PM PST by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

I’m surprised to hear a lib like Adler making this point. I’d expect him to gripe about it, rather than explain it.


30 posted on 11/09/2016 4:39:09 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

re: There is no advantage to running up the score

The author doesn’t know Mike Madigan of IL.


32 posted on 11/09/2016 4:49:58 PM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Irrelevant and sour grapes. The “game” is played to win the most Electoral College votes, not the popular vote. If the rules were different, the game would be played differently.

As an example from another hotly-contested endeavor, look at the 2003 MLB World Series. As we all know, the MLB World Series winner is the first team that wins 4 games in a head-to-head series. In 2003, that was the Florida Marlins. If after the series, the losing Yankees followed the WaPo model, they’d be indignant, saying they should be the declared winner, because they scored more total runs and had more total hits.

Of course, you don’t change the rules after the fact - unless you’re a whiny Dem.


39 posted on 11/09/2016 5:13:41 PM PST by Be Free (I believe in gun control. The more people that control their own guns, the safer we'll all be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

This is only because of asinine states like California.

Trump got 200,000 less votes than leisure suit Satan, ehem..., Hitlery.

In carrying insane California with all its illegal immigrant voters and what not, Hitlery got 2.5 MILLION more votes than Trump.

A 2.5 MILLION vote margin of victory in one crazy state is enough to slaughter the popular vote nation wide.

Just wait a few more decades and all the conservatives have left and instead of California getting 62% votes for Dem candidates it will be 98%. Won’t they be howling to end the brilliant Electoral College then.

LOL. Burn in hell my fellow Californians. Well, you evil ones know who you are. I can’t wait to retire and leave this opressive commie bastion from hell and never look back. May the devastating 8.0 earthquake come swiftly after I am gone.


42 posted on 11/09/2016 5:58:02 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (News of the future: Attorney General Rudy Giuliani convicts felon Hillary Clinton on all counts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Cliffs notes: Hillary got 2.5 million more California votes than Trump.

3.0 million CA votes for Trump.

5.5 million CA votes for Hitlery.

California is a one party commie lib Democrat state. Stick a fork in her.


43 posted on 11/09/2016 5:59:50 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (News of the future: Attorney General Rudy Giuliani convicts felon Hillary Clinton on all counts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson