Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 11th_VA

I’d call it more of a “shy” Trump vote phenomenon rather a “monster” vote one. But nonetheless, no big time pollster picked it up. There were a couple that had Trump up 1-2 in the popular vote at the end, but even they are going to be wrong because Clinton will likely win the popular vote. If Trump had won the popular vote by 1-2, he may have taken a couple more states.


11 posted on 11/09/2016 11:00:09 AM PST by randita (PLEASE STOP ALL THE WORTHLESS VANITIES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: randita

The popular vote overage for Clinton is almost all in CA and NY, so it wouldn’t have affected the electoral count. And I think a good percentage of it comes from fake and illegal votes, anyway. His number one job after he is sworn in is to go after organized Democrat vote fraud, everywhere it can be found.


18 posted on 11/09/2016 11:03:50 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: randita

It was a monster vote for Trump.
Only a monster vote could have fought the Clinton/establishment/elite/money/media monsters (plural!) to just barely pulling off a win.
Stick anyone else in Trump’s shoes and Hillary would have utterly dominated the election map. took a monster to counteract that.


26 posted on 11/09/2016 11:12:21 AM PST by ctdonath2 ("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson