Skip to comments.
Podesta: Calling Chelsea ‘Not Smart’ Is An ‘Understatement’
dailycaller.com ^
| 11/4/2016
| Blake Neff
Posted on 11/04/2016 9:31:50 AM PDT by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
To: rktman
Sounds more like Chelsea is not as corrupt as the rest of them.
21
posted on
11/04/2016 9:40:00 AM PDT
by
aquila48
To: rktman
At least Chelsea seems more honest than her parents.
To: cgbg
This leak series does give her some credit for kicking back at some of the corruption. Why she tried we can’t tell.
Maybe to preserve her interests, maybe because of some bit of conscience, who knows.
She was “stupid” of course for not realizing the nature and purpose of the whole thing.
23
posted on
11/04/2016 9:40:31 AM PDT
by
buwaya
To: rktman
“...Chelsea had apparently launched an internal investigation of the Clinton Foundations finances...”
Maybe mom asked her to see if anyone had sticky fingers..... ha!
24
posted on
11/04/2016 9:40:34 AM PDT
by
SMARTY
("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
To: Lazamataz
That’s the way I’m reading it, too.
25
posted on
11/04/2016 9:40:54 AM PDT
by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Democrats: The perfect party for the helpless and stupid, and those who would rule over them.)
To: rktman
Chelsea Clinton conducting an internal investigation of a non-profit organization is like a first-grader studying quantum physics.
26
posted on
11/04/2016 9:41:04 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
To: rktman
Oh, he’s not saying SHE’s not smart, he’s saying its not smart t to be talking in public.
27
posted on
11/04/2016 9:41:28 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Make America Normal Again)
To: rktman
It think this merely means that Chelsea pulled a bonehead move by blathering about her investigation, not necessarily that she has a below-80 IQ.
To: tomkat
BEST. ELECTION. EVER.
If only he would have remarked about her looks too.
To: rickmichaels
30
posted on
11/04/2016 9:42:31 AM PDT
by
ronniesgal
( Go Trump!!!)
To: rktman
31
posted on
11/04/2016 9:43:08 AM PDT
by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: buwaya
I thought I had seen another article that went into a little more detail about it.
The issue she was complaining about wasn't the corruption of the Foundation itself, but the corruption of all the leeches (employees and consultants) who were ripping it off to pad their own wallets.
She really does sound like a dim bulb. Did she really think a criminal enterprise would attract honest people? LOL.
32
posted on
11/04/2016 9:43:09 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
To: 1Old Pro
” Probably nice enough....” I’ve read some things from her time at whatever network hired her and the folks that worked near her said she’s just as nasty and spoiled as her momma. Like, DO NOT make eye contact, DO NOT address her, stay out of the way.
33
posted on
11/04/2016 9:43:26 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: americas.best.days...
The speed with which it’s all happening just pins my ears back !
34
posted on
11/04/2016 9:43:34 AM PDT
by
tomkat
(MONSTER ! VOTE)
To: tomkat
35
posted on
11/04/2016 9:43:54 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(Another World War I veteran for Hillary!)
To: rktman
Democratic nominee Hillary Clintons campaign chairman John Podesta said it was a major understatement when an important Clinton Foundation figure described Chelsea Clinton as not smart, a newly-leaked email reveals. Too bad Her Heinous couldn't get Hall and Oates to perform at any of her rallies. They could dedicate one of their biggest hits
to Chelsea
36
posted on
11/04/2016 9:43:59 AM PDT
by
Impala64ssa
(You call me an islamophobe like it's a bad thing.)
To: RightGeek
THAT !
37
posted on
11/04/2016 9:44:41 AM PDT
by
tomkat
(MONSTER ! VOTE)
To: tomkat
But, will it be fast enough? And, what of all the early ballots cast for the beast? Any amending allowed? In some states but, is it too much too late?
38
posted on
11/04/2016 9:45:24 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: cgbg
Got it, thanks .. will check it out, FRiend
39
posted on
11/04/2016 9:45:28 AM PDT
by
tomkat
(MONSTER ! VOTE)
To: aquila48
“Not smart” = not on board Clinton crony criminal activities, and talking about crime family business to outsiders.
40
posted on
11/04/2016 9:46:09 AM PDT
by
Cecily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson