SMOKING GUN! Wikileaks Email Shows Intent to Destroy Emails After Reports on Secret Email Server

The Gateway Pundit ^ | 1 Nov 16 | Jim Hoft

[xzins]

SMOKING GUN! Wikileaks Email Shows Intent to Destroy Emails After Reports on Secret Email Server

Jim Hoft Nov 1st, 2016 11:10 am Leave a Comment

WIKILEAKS DISCOVERS THE SMOKING GUN–
The Clinton Campaign discussed destroying email evidence after story broke nationally that Hillary Clinton had an illegal homebrew server for her emails.

On March 2, 2015 The New York Times reported that Hillary Clinton used a personal email server as Secretary of State.

On March 2, 2015 Hillary Clinton’s top aide and attorney wrote John Podesta that “we are going to have to dump all those emails.”

They are finally busted.
Congratulations, Wikileaks. You did it.

Director Comey, here, I've done your job for you. Here is the intent. #podestaemails25 pic.twitter.com/2xYNqK4EHI

— MicroSpookyLeaks™ (@WDFx2EU7) November 1, 2016

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,

Gateway Pundit

---

[Red Steel]

I think good Rush.

[ichabod1]

I have to agree, given everything that’s come out it looks like St. Julian’s prediction is coming to pass.

[xzins]

After living here, you know she doesn’t want sharia, so I’m betting on a safe English speaking environment on the edge of despotism: Canada anyone?

[ichabod1]

I think a lot of people have no idea how many copies of emails routinely get made. When I worked for a certain business, a pogrom of sorts happened where everyone was forced to get rid of all emails over a certain age and adopt controlled retention going forward. Never say anything in an email that you’re not prepared to testify about in court.

[xzins]

Thank goodness. :>)

“Bad Rush” needs to hide until next Wednesday.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: based on the wording of Podesta, dump could mean publicly release ::

Really? Podesta encouraged a PUBLIC release of StateDepartment emails, some including NatSec????

You be funny, white boy!

[Pearls Before Swine]

Yoga emails, he meant yoga emails, everybody knows that ...

Yeah, 'cuz the fact that she can't reach her knees would be something she'd want to withhold from the electorate. /S

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

Then they trace when the emails were deleted or however they got rid of them as much as it can be traced, hopefully with the date this was done, and by who it was done.

[Mariner]

This is not a smoking gun.

These emails were not under subpoena when this email was sent.

[HollyB]

Or put on Weiner’s computer.

[HollyB]

dump dəmp/Submit noun 1. a site for depositing garbage. synonyms: transfer station, garbage dump, landfill (site), rubbish heap, dumping ground; More 2. COMPUTING a copying of stored data to a different location, performed typically as a protection against loss. verb 1. deposit or dispose of (garbage, waste, or unwanted material), typically in a careless or hurried way. "trucks dumped 1,900 tons of refuse here" synonyms: dispose of, get rid of, throw away/out, discard, jettison; More 2. COMPUTING copy (stored data) to a different location, especially so as to protect against loss.

[Organic Panic]

If a democrat commits a crime and a democrat refuses to prosecute a crime did a crime take place?

OF COURSE NOT!

They’re democrats.

[HollyB]

More on the story here:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-01/podesta-mills-we-are-going-have-dump-all-those-emails

[showme_the_Glory]

wipe

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Ask her (arranged) (first) husband what she wants.
Taqqiya.

[Deo volente]

Willful destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice, interference with a federal investigation...that’s just for starters.

She needs to withdraw and let Kaine lose this election.

[Art in Idaho]

Bears repeating:

"That’s not the purpose of a political pardon. The purpose of a political pardon is to protect a relatively innocent man, such as Richard Nixon, from any further politically motivated destruction than had already been unfairly meted out to him. NOT to protect actual criminals like the Clintons from the justice they so richly deserve."

[xzins]

***This is not a smoking gun.
These emails were not under subpoena when this email was sent.***

We’re talking about proving intent.

You cannot separate the other indications of intent: lies, server, deleted emails, etc.

And NOW there is proof HER office had discussed getting rid of the emails when their existence becomes public.

Nor can we avoid remembering that those emails belong to the nation, and that destruction of the public record is ALREADY a criminal act.

[Whenifhow]

PING!!!

Article and many, many comments, esp #109 from rolling_stone

fysa

is military acronym for :

for your situational awareness
].................................
timing NY times 3/2/15 article about private server
3/3/15 dump email

as for intent its the timing they never released them except in 2014 and then “dumped” or bleachbitted them march 25-31 within 30 days of the subpoena....probable cause is what a reasonable person would think...

...It turned out that Keilar’s assumption was accurate. The 31,830 personal emails that Keilar asked about were deleted “sometime between March 25-31, 2015,” according to the FBI. That was about three weeks after Clinton received a House subpoena on March 4, 2015....

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/09/the-fbi-files-on-clintons-emails/

Thanks, xzins

[PIF]

Satire is lost on you it seems.