Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scott from the Left Coast
It is started to be picked up now by the media. I expect there will be an analysis of the legality of what was going on along with the scope of the Clintons' greed.

I found this to be interesting:

For-Profit Activity of President Clinton (i.e., Bill Clinton, Inc.) Independent of our fundraising and decision-making activities on behalf of the Foundation, we have dedicated ourselves to helping the President secure and engage in for-profit activities – including speeches, books, and advisory service engagements. In that context, we have in effect served as agents, lawyers, managers and implementers to secure speaking, business and advisory service deals. In support of the President’s for-profit activity, we also have solicited and obtained, as appropriate, in-kind services for the President and his family – for personal travel, hospitality, vacation and the like. Neither Justin nor I are separately compensated for these activities (e.g., we do not receive a fee for, or percentage of, the more than $50 million in for-profit activity we have personally helped to secure for President Clinton to date or the $66 million in future contracts, should he choose to continue with those engagements).

With respect to business deals for his advisory services, Justin and I found, developed and brought to President Clinton multiple arrangements for him to accept or reject. Of his current 4 arrangements, we secured all of them; and, we have helped manage and maintain all of his for-profit business relationships. Since 2001, President Clinton’s business arrangements have yielded more than $30 million for him personally, with $66 million to be paid out over the next nine years should he choose to continue with the current engagements.

I wonder if the Clintons included the "in-kind services" in their tax returns. They need to be monetized and taxed.

32 posted on 10/26/2016 11:22:05 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

Their accountants should have made that danger clear. But I would be willing to wager a reasonable sum they didn’t claim it. Certainly not all of it...”and the like”

Somewhere back there in that phrase “and the like” lurks Jeffrey Epstein. I’d bet the house on that.


34 posted on 10/26/2016 11:27:02 AM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast (When you are going through Hell, keep going. #FreeJulian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson