Posted on 10/25/2016 5:18:14 AM PDT by SJackson
.
That “somewhere” has been known for a decade.
Its a grotto below the surface of the Temple Mount.
It was discovered by the late Ron Wyatt, the man who also located the Red Sea crossing.
.
.
Samaritans are definitely not of Israeli origin. They were imported to the region by Shalmanesser.
.
That image is not of three tablets, it is three views of one tablet.
.
Samaria is just a small part of the land occupied by the northern tribes, from the time that Joshua led them into the Land.
.
Contradictory "points of view" cannot both be true; if formulated properly, one of them must be false and the other must be true. Consider:
1) The Moon is made entirely of green cheese.
2) The Moon is made entirely of sticky rice.
Clearly both (1) and (2) above cannot both be true. They could, however, both be false. The Moon, for example, might be a giant pizza. The "points of view" must be formulated properly:
3) The Moon is made entirely of blue cheese.
4) The Moon is NOT made entirely of blue cheese.
Statements (3) and (4) are direct contradictions. One of them must be true, and the other must be false.
Now consider the "points of view" at hand:
5) Jesus of Nazareth was God incarnate.
6) Jesus of Nazareth was NOT God incarnate.
Like my examples (3) and (4), the real dispute captured in (5) and (6) is a simple, properly formulated, direct contradiction. One of those statements is necessarily false and the other is necessarily true. They cannot both be true; they cannot both be false. This matter cannot simply be dismissed as mere "differing points of view". Which of them is true, which is false, is a matter of eternal importance.
.
Read the Bible for a change.
The northern lands were parceled out by Joshua. Later Dan also claimed lands east of the Jordan river.
Manasseh was actually the largest tribe.
The squabble between Solomon’s sons was not that big of a deal. It had nothing to do with land.
.
Can’t be so.
History Channel’s “Curse of Oak Island” series claims the Ark etc are there in the ‘Money Pit’, courtesy of the Knights Templar.
(Besides the idiot/crap “Ancient Aliens” series, “Oak Island” is one of the worst on that channel.)
I’ve heard Wyatt’s name before, but I had no idea he was involved in all that. If you have any good links for him, besides the Wiki stuff I’m now reading, I’d appreciate them.
.
The stuff on the Ark is tightly controlled by the Israeli government, but there are several witnesses that have seen it.
The Red Sea crossing can be viewed:
www.TheRedSeaCrossing.com
Use the code: redseafree in the red box for access.
.
.
Shamanesser is the name of the king that spread them across the northern lands surrounding the Mediterranean.
There is nothing in the Bible that says that they would forget who they are.
It was common knowledge knowledge who and where they were in the first century. They were referred to as The dispersion.
They were the majority of the people that Paul evangelized. (they were the people to whom Yeshua was ‘sent.’)
.
5) Jesus of Nazareth was God incarnate.
6) Jesus of Nazareth was NOT God incarnate.
Like my examples (3) and (4), the real dispute captured in (5) and (6) is a simple, properly formulated, direct contradiction. One of those statements is necessarily false and the other is necessarily true. They cannot both be true; they cannot both be false. This matter cannot simply be dismissed as mere "differing points of view". Which of them is true, which is false, is a matter of eternal importance.
which is false<<<
The one that is internally, intrinsically contradictory: God "in-carn-ate."
late Middle English: from ecclesiastical Latin incarnat- ‘made flesh,’ from the verb incarnare, from in- ‘into’ + caro, carn- ‘flesh.’
God ≠ flesh
The NT is filled with examples of the religious experts of the day thinking that Jesus was claiming to be God, along with his futile attempts to correct them. His words fell on deaf ears. Ergo, the NT witnesses against those who make that same accusation.
NT readers = Christians. After almost 2000 years and the invention of the printing press for over 500, you'd think folks would have caught on by now.
eternal importance
Injurious speech, lashon hara = telling others that a certain man claimed to be God (committed blasphemy) when he did nothing of the sort.
It’s known that the Chofetz Chaim believed that lashon hara, or evil speech, was the main cause of our long, bitter exile. The Chofetz Chaim stated on more than one occasion that as soon as the sin of lashon hara was fixed, the exile would end and the Moshiach would come.
http://www.emunaroma.com/blog/a-crash-course-in-the-laws-of-lashon-hara-online
Then you have ignored the minor prophets.. and why Christ Himself called the House of Israel, ‘lost sheep’ of the House of Israel. Christ knew who and where they were, but they sure did not and in overwhelming majority are still lost, just like you!!!
You are the one that is lost here!
Everyone knew who they were. They spoke a different language for one thing. They were called strangers. (Even by Peter in his epistle to them)
It sure all gets by you easily!
.
Do you really think that the Scandinavian people don’t know that they are descendants of Dan?
Why do you suppose “Denmark” is called Dansk?
That was a good way of explaining it. And yes, getting it straight is a matter of eternal importance.
Yeah that was funny!
when a man in a Jewish society stands up and tells his opponents "Amen I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM" ...
He is absolutely NOT trying to deny his divinity.
Jus' sayin' ...
But I think you do understand my actual point, that a properly formulated contradiction on an important matter cannot simply be dismissed as "differing points of view".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.