Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timpanagos1
So then the other two out of three live where?

the cities and rural areas

I understand that. The question was rhetorical. What is implied is that more poor people live in rural areas than in either the cities or the suburbs, which I find surprising.

11 posted on 10/24/2016 9:14:00 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign

Not at all, as they are likely using a national poverty level based on income, and skewed towards the cost of living in a suburban or urban area.

Thus those making 50k in an urban area would be considered in poverty and their reality would be poverty. And those living in a rural area would be considered living in poverty, but their reality would not be poverty.

Cities are expensive.


14 posted on 10/24/2016 9:21:05 AM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: FreeReign

What is implied is that more poor people live in rural areas than in either the cities or the suburbs, which I find surprising.

*****************************

Go exploring through Appalachia or rural Mississippi or hundreds of Indian reservations.


16 posted on 10/24/2016 10:12:05 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson