Posted on 10/23/2016 11:02:30 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
After we have been insulted by another faked poll we have to keep in mind that Wikileaks just released an email from the Clinton camp discussing ways to use over sampling to build a fake narrative that Hillary Clinton is pulling away.
https://i.redd.it/psdkjw2049tx.jpg
Donald Trump’s support among Catholics is at a record high level; and Hillary Clinton’s support among Catholics is at a record low. We know this because of a survey done by the Washington Post.
The latest Washington Post ABC News poll of Catholic likely voters said Trump is leading 50/34.
So where is the lie? On October 7th the results of a Washington Post ABC News Langer Research survey were announced and showed Trump leading 57/33.
Notice that the Langer Research name is now missing. The link for that survey result was http://www.langerresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/1182a12016ElectionPredebate.pdf but now guess what? That link has been pulled down. It has been 404’ed.
This is another example of the Washington Post and ABC News lying. This is no surprise since both of these “news outlets” are loaded with Democrat Operatives who were exposed by name by wikileaks.
They are trying to fool Catholics into believing we were not insulted or turned off to the Democrats by the wikileaks’ revelation that John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, has been plotting with fake “Catholic” front groups to overthrow the authority of the Pope.
They hope we are not smart enough to understand that this would destroy the Roman Catholic Church in America and by extension the world over.
The wikileaks drop of that email was released on Oct 12th but there is no evidence that this information had gotten to Catholics at the time that they were polled.
To the contrary, since that revelation several Catholic bishops have made serious negative comments about the plot and Cardinal Dolan of New York, an influential member of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, has asked Hillary Clinton to apologize for the affront.
Have you heard or read about that request or whether or not she did apologize? She has not apologized. By The Way this is day five since the cardinal asked for the apology we all know will never come.
http://truthfeed.com/wikileaks-bombshell-clinton-camp-plots-to-overthrow-catholic-church-and-purge-fundamental-teachings/29142/
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cardinal-dolan-clinton-owes-catholics-an-apology
Since 1952 every Republican getting at least 50% of the Catholic vote has won election to the presidency. Only one Democrat has gotten as little as 39% that was the hapless Walter Mondale in his 49 state landslide loss to Ronald Reagan in 1984.
No winning Democrat candidate has ever gotten less than 47% putting Hillary Clinton, at best 13 points off the winning track.
Of great importance is that as we have seen in so many other surveys, there is a sizable “undecided” factor (16 points) in this survey of Catholics.
If Trump merely splits that number he moves to 58/42 which will give me a big advantage. It would put Trump at the second highest level for a Republican with Catholics and put Clinton at the second lowest level for a Democrat with Catholics.
http://cara.georgetown.edu/presidential%20vote%20only.pdf
Can anyone reasonably assert that once the impact of the Podesta plot against the Catholic Church begins to sink in it will be damaging to Clinton?
Can anyone say Trump’s calling Clinton a Catholic hater at the Al Smith dinner on Thursday night did not help spread the word about Clinton’s plot?
Isn’t it logical that Trump’s numbers among Catholics would go up and Clinton’s would go down among Catholics?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76yJw_Uu7w0
No it didn't. The email in question doesn't say that at all.
The problem with Catholic polls is which ones they’re polling. A Washington Post would likely be polling Irish, Italian and other such white East Coast Catholics whereas in the Southwest and West Coast, they would be Hispanic. Hispanics usually vote Democrat.
FOX and Friends had a priest on this morning (didn’t catch his name or where he’s from, small thin guy) who was concerned Catholics were voting by party or candidate rather than looking at the issues. His delivery wasn’t very good and appeared to be hesitant to come out and say bluntly what was on his mind. Bottom line was vote for life.
He should have pointed out that there is NO way one can be a Christian and a democrat at the same time !!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.