[Son House]

Came across Joel Benenson in a previous 2012 Article while searching on middle-out economics, knowing it wasn’t economics but political, it polls nice, so Democrats use it.

But instead of talking about the middle-out economic scheme of Clinton, the one-note media is worried about whether Trump accepts election results.

Clinton could and by the evidence so far ruin the American economy, but news media likely won’t stray from their Democrat narrative.

And Democrats will brag the middle income has increased, but will they be challenged to the decrease over the middle class population during the Obama administration?

November 2012
‘Middle-out’ economics trumped ‘trickle-down’ on Nov. 6 - Now policies should reflect that
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-a-budget/268955-middle-out-economics-trumped-trickle-down-on-nov-6-now-polices-should-reflect-that

And Joel Benenson, the president’s pollster, wrote in a November New York Times op-ed: "When asked what the key to growing our economy was, nearly two in three voters said it was building a strong middle class over creating a 'healthy climate for business.'"

[Morgan in Denver]

There’s no such thing as trickle down economics. The left made that up, poll tested it and uses it to damn the real facts. There’s demand side and supply side economics. Supply side works and demand side does not. The middle out is new this election cycle to further distort demand side failures.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

‘Middle-out’ economics trumped ‘trickle-down’ on Nov. 6..."When asked what the key to growing our economy was, nearly two in three voters said it was building a strong middle class over creating a 'healthy climate for business.'"

Which the RATs will do by stopping global warming.....or some crap.