Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O’Keefe Posts Warning: Part III Is Coming Monday – Hillary and Donna Brazile Implicated
thegatewaypundit.com ^ | Oct 22nd, 2016

Posted on 10/22/2016 7:29:13 AM PDT by Helicondelta

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 last
To: maggief

Hmm.


81 posted on 10/23/2016 2:30:18 PM PDT by Ray76 (Communism is a lie told by the Prince of Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

My son is saying the same thing - that they are waiting until she can’t be replaced - what day will that be??


82 posted on 10/23/2016 4:18:11 PM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch ( I would LOVE to have my old "substandard" insurance back. It didn't cost $1300 a month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch; MNDude
My son is saying the same thing - that they are waiting until she can’t be replaced - what day will that be??

Conceivably, a presidential candidate can be replaced right up to the day before the election.

There is no ballot restriction. Voters are actually voting for the candidate's electors, not the candidate.

The party would have to select a new candidate and make a public announcement to that effect, while instructing the electors to vote for the new candidate when the Electoral College meets (on the Monday after the second Wednesday in December).

83 posted on 10/23/2016 4:29:04 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Tuscaloosa Goldfinch

They obviously waited for the early voting to begin. The Democrats strategy of pushing as many early voters through as possible will work against them now.


84 posted on 10/23/2016 4:40:38 PM PDT by MNDude (God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

This is probably the last chance for something like this to be strong/bad enough to break through and provide a final boost to Trump.

If it just looks questionable but can’t force action against Hillary, I think it will have no more effect than one more trumped-up female complaint against Trump on the other side.


85 posted on 10/23/2016 4:43:44 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

They don’t know exactly what O’Keefe has. No point in denying the wrong crime!

IMHO they are getting scared spitless, and there are rumors that good guys in NSA and other places in fedgov leaked stuff to Wikileaks. There are good guys in gov who do not want Hitlery!


86 posted on 10/23/2016 4:45:10 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker; Helicondelta

The fake charges against Trump are transparent, feeble and desperate attempts to derail his support. No one believes them.

OTOH, evidence from O’Keefe’s videos, and leaked or hacked emails, are solid. Not made up, not pretend, not dragging a $100 bill through a trailer park to find porn stars who’ll lie.

And everyone knows this.

It creates a lot of doubt in peoples’ minds, and it’s a good start for real legal action against Hitlery and plenty of others, once Trump is in the WH.


87 posted on 10/23/2016 4:47:43 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Hillary would be pardoned before Trump was sworn in.


88 posted on 10/23/2016 4:54:07 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

So you say. I disagree.


89 posted on 10/23/2016 4:55:02 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I will be happy if we are in a situation for either of us to be proven wrong...


90 posted on 10/23/2016 5:19:25 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: GregNH; All

OUTSTANDING link. Thanks very much, GregNH

BUMP-TO-THE-TRUTH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkgTCLTuy1Y

MUST SEE BUMP!


91 posted on 10/23/2016 7:04:48 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; Helicondelta; Nita Nupress
Let me get this straight - unless I go along with your opinion, I am a troll? Sorry, FR is not and never has been about groupthink.

And, by the way, learn to read numbers - I have a 1999 sign-up date (although I was lurking for a while before that).

92 posted on 10/24/2016 3:07:21 AM PDT by BruceS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: JenB987

“The videos will fall into the conservative echo chamber and nothing will come of them.”

Stop posting FUD. The Veritas videos have been seen by millions on social networks. Of those millions more are posting them on their social media sites. The word has been getting out & that will not stop no matter what the propaganda for Cankles media do or don’t broadcast.

Add to that the pro-Trump PACs & Trump’s own ad blitz that’ supposed to start today & you have the information out for all to see. Trump is going to win. Stop believing in the false “power” of the media.

Vote Trump 2016


93 posted on 10/24/2016 3:14:58 AM PDT by TheStickman (Trump will be the 1st Pro America president since Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: JenB987
The videos will fall into the conservative echo chamber and nothing will come of them.

Isn't that a Cialdini method?

94 posted on 10/24/2016 3:17:08 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: theoilpainter
Why did he wait? After the last debate, there is no way to let most Americans know, as little negative material about Clinton will be reported.

Another one. They must be banging like rabbits at the DNC to produce all y'all.

95 posted on 10/24/2016 3:20:27 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: virgil
Are they going to take away O’Keefe’s internet access too?

I'd say he is as much of a pain in their asses as Breitbart or Michael Hastings.

96 posted on 10/24/2016 3:22:29 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BruceS

Nope, but you seem to be employing the technique “concern trolling”, emotional valence “despair” from the Hillary campaign internet manual:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CveYFo4XYAAvBej.jpg

The evidence is not conclusive but you can’t blame others for being suspicious. Your input was not very constructive.


97 posted on 10/24/2016 4:03:23 AM PDT by Helicondelta (Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta
So who made you the arbiter of whether my opinion is acceptable? Yes, I am pessimistic. No, I do not particularly like Trump. Yes, I think that if we would have nominated someone who knew how to not get distracted by trivial personal matters, he/she would be many points up. Yes, I think that the average voter in this country is getting a very narrow view of what is happening in the campaign and it will affect the election.

I don't care at all about whether you think that I am doing what the Hillary campaign put in an internet manual (and you think they put what they really think online?). If you don't like what I say, too bad.

98 posted on 10/24/2016 4:51:07 PM PDT by BruceS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson