Nowhere in this thread has anybody “idolized” pot, but that didn’t seem to stop you from throwing out the (false) accusation repeatedly, superior holy boy.
If you oppose prohibition, say so explicitly, otherwise it will be safe to assume that the repeated arguing against the points of those who do oppose prohibition is intended to support that tyrannical regime.
If you deployed your mad skillz in the use of logic, I wouldn’t have to spell everything out for you.
Perhaps you should open your mind while being a preachy prude for your pot religion and consider this: pot damages your mad skillz in the use of logic. :-D