Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurkinanloomin

He is a closet progressive. When he wanted to bolster his right-wing bonafides, he claimed to be a fan of Ayn Rand.

Rand is interesting only in a narrow sense. She wasn’t a good writer, and definitely not a subtle one. Her characters are cartoon stereotypes rather than well developed, complex people. She was herself a very unpleasant person, and ran a cult-like salon in which no one could question her. Although often associated with libertarianism, she was hardly an enemy of the state, arguing vociferously for war in Vietnam and for suppressing left radicals in the US.

She is, of course, a bugbear to progressives, and not without reason. She was more a house intellectual to the super-rich than a careful thinker.

It’s almost like he chose a writer that he thought conservatives unblinkingly admired. But why couldn’t he have chosen Hayek if he wanted to support classical liberalism?


23 posted on 10/22/2016 12:43:51 AM PDT by oblomov (We have passed the point where "law," properly speaking, has any further application. - C. Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: oblomov

If Ayn Rand were alive she would be attacking Hillary Clinton loudly and clearly as the “shoot and loot” candidate and the major media as modern “witch doctors”.

Ryan has just been corrupted by big money—when that happens all politicians start speaking in word salads.


29 posted on 10/22/2016 3:08:00 AM PDT by cgbg (This space for rent--$250K)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson