[Falcon4.0]

How come Wallace didn't ask the same question to hillary?

[luvbach1]

How can Trump refuse to accept election results when there aren’t any results yet?

[bert]

neither..... just plain old common sense

[Mjreagan]

Genius? Trump is one, but in this case it’s common sense and a set of balls.

[ClearCase_guy]

The question that Christopher Wallace asked, as I heard it, went something like this:

"Mr. Trump, will you allow the Democrats to cheat as much as they want, and blatantly steal this election through illegal means, and do you promise to accept the bogus result and simply disappear without a fight?"

And Trump answered: "No."

Which, of course, has outraged the Democrats.

[Ohioan]

Nixon made a terrible precedent setting mistake, in not filing a Court challenge to the “miracle” in 1960, whereby the Democrats came up with 25k Kennedy votes, on the day after the election, to save Illinois for Kennedy. That strange happening should have been challenged, and thoroughly investigated. Honest elections should not be sacrificed in order for those victimized to prove they are good sports!

[grania]

I seem to remember Trump going along with “the pledge” and then Kasick and Jeb refusing to honor their pledge. So why should Trump promise anything? Keep in mind that Kasick is governor of a battleground state, the one where the state RNC was sabotaging the campaign effort.

[ScottinVA]

Oh, bullcrap (not directed at you, 2ndDivVet)... Trump didn’t refuse; he said he’d look at the situation. With the recent revelations of dead Americans being registered, illegals voting and other irregularities — not to mention the 140% “turnout” in the Philly ‘hoods in 2012 — why should he or anyone for that matter summarily take the results at face value? Norm Coleman didn’t fight the “results” in MN in 2008 and how well did that work out for him?

[TigersEye]

Trump didn’t say that but...

Algore!

[pepsi_junkie]

What is election fraud, really? It is putting in fake votes or votes from those not entitled to vote to directly cancel out the votes of citizens who voted a certain way. It's disenfranchisement of those people, plain and simple. The same result could be achieved by burning votes they don't like and people would be outraged. But they hide it behind fake registrations and illegals and dead people and people say "I didn't see anything" and they get away with it. It's up to the GOP to fight back. The fact that the GOP has stood by for years and years and looked the other way has always been disgraceful. When Al Franken stole the election in Minnesota, for example, in agonizing slow motion mind you, it stole the right to vote from many Minnesotans and when Norm Coleman decided to stand aside and be a gentlemen about it, he because complicit.

I want someone who will fight for fair elections and for fair government that respects our rights, not someone who puts principles on the shelf when the going gets tough.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

I want Trump to fight for EVERY Vote that he thinks might have been STOLEN from the Voter! State by State. County by County. Town by Town. House by House, if need be!

Tie it up in the courts for YEARS; keep Hillary! OUT and keep 0bama on board just to piss him off and DELAY the rest of his lazy, feckless, bought-and-paid-for-by-We-The-People, Life!

[right way right]

I expect Trump to pursue and fight voter fraud even after he wins and holds the office.
This guy does not just let things that don't make America great slide.

[Williams]

He didn’t refuse to accept anything, he said he will not decide before the fact.

[Logical me]

That was fast and correct response to this stupid question. Trump proves that he has the intelligence to be President. Hillary is a cheep crook and hasn't a real brain but has to rehearse everything she says. She is fake.

Trump for President.

[GregoTX]

When were the election results determined to be a hitlary win?

[Sybeck1]

Remember McCain when he said we had nothing to fear from a Obama presidency?

Those words will never be said by Trump about Hillary

[proud American in Canada]

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time...”

Donald plans to do it without blood.

[proud American in Canada]

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time...”

Donald plans to do it without blood.

[Donglalinger]

Hillary will have hundreds of lawyers on standby on election day, Democrats fight to win

[poinq]

The way Wallace asked the question was disingenuous. And Trump did not do a good job with it. First, Wallace implied that the choice was between accepting the result or violence. Trump can easily reject the election and still not cause violence. Violence has nothing to do with it. Its not like Trump is going back and collect his army.

Second, why should Trump accept this election? Between the IRS, the media’s pay to play (we will give you answers or let you edit our stories and you give us quotes), the foreign pay to play through the Clinton Foundation, the FBI’s abdication of authority (Martha Stewart went to jail for less), its been far from fair. Additionally, the Democrat party, White House and Hillary campaign sent Hooligans to riot at Trump rallies which speaks to a Hitler, brown shirt type of government takeover. All of this is to fight democracy. The elite don’t think we will get the vote right. So they are doing everything legal and illegal to put their thumb, foot and ass on the scales ensuring a Hillary win. I won’t accept this election and neither should anyone else.