I seem to recall that the main focus of the Kerry campaign in 2004 was on alleged GOP fraud in Ohio, but Bush's margin of victory there easily surpassed any possible effect of fraud.
There was an investigation of the voting machines used in Ohio conducted by a Democrat-controlled legislature, and videos of some of those hearings are still available on YouTube.
Creamer, or the other career criminal—whichever. I’m not reviewing both videos—said that the Dems have been doing voter fraud for fifty years, and they do what they have to to “beat you f@#$ing a@@holes”. Their own admission that this has been going on since Johnson if not Kennedy, is proof enough.
Near as I can tell, GOP fraud does not exist.
Dem fraud is pervasive enough that I would question any rat win of less than 1 point or maybe 2, ie Al Gore’s popular vote margin, Obama winning Florida in 2012 and NC and IN in 2008, the 2010 IL Governor’s race, the 2004 WA Governor’s race (DOUBLE recount until the rat won, unreal), and many House and Senate races over the years. If a rat wins by 0.5 or only after a recount, I presume the Republican won for sure, if 1.5%, the Republican probably won.
But anything much more than that, Obama winning nationwide, Harry Reid winning in 2010, “rigged” massive fraud? No. Too often it’s used as an excuse to explain away terrible campaigns by Republicans.