To: Jeff Chandler
My wife and I watched it, and we both thought the moderator (Chris Wallace) let Clinton run on and on, yet he cut Trump off in midstream. Also, every question Wallace asked, he let Clinton respond first, up until the last two questions. But of all the moderators of the three debates, I’d have to say Wallace was the least obnoxious, and he did in fact hit Clinton with a couple tough questions.
11 posted on
10/19/2016 7:52:39 PM PDT by
ought-six
(Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
To: ought-six
This time I don’t think the moderator was bad. It was a pressure situation and people will criticize either way but I thought he put fair questions, evenly, to the candidates. It was not “totally biased”...again, tough job and I think he was very nervous, he sounded like he had to ask questions that he didn’t want to ask. I respect that, it seemed unrehearsed or expected from either candidate.
63 posted on
10/19/2016 8:23:43 PM PDT by
fuzzylogic
(welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
To: ought-six
My wife and I watched it, and we both thought the moderator (Chris Wallace) let Clinton run on and on, yet he cut Trump off in midstream. Also, every question Wallace asked, he let Clinton respond first, up until the last two questions. But of all the moderators of the three debates, Id have to say Wallace was the least obnoxious, and he did in fact hit Clinton with a couple tough questions. Couldn't have said it better myself, so I won't.
77 posted on
10/19/2016 8:40:53 PM PDT by
itsahoot
(GOP says, Vote Trump. But if your principles won't let you, Hillary is OK.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson