I think that's disgusting, Anita!!
Saying you'd put a hair on a soda can again!
...never mind
Posted on 10/19/2016 12:20:24 PM PDT by simpson96
In 1991 Anita Hill accused then-Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas of workplace sexual harassment, catapulting the issue into national consciousness for the first time.
It came at a huge personal cost to Hill, as her character and the veracity of her testimony was called into question.
But despite all of that, yes, she would do it all over again, she said Wednesday at Fortune’s Most Powerful Women Summit.
Hill’s conversation with author, comedian, and actress Chelsea Handler comes amid a renewed national dialogue about harassment as several women have come forward accusing Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump of sexual assault—accusations Trump has denied.
(Excerpt) Read more at amp.timeinc.net ...
If it weren't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all.
#NEVERHILLARY
For the same amount of money?
http://fortune.com/2016/10/19/anita-hill-id-do-it-all-over-again/
PROVEN LIAR AND PHONY. Cheaper than a two bit w***e.
I think that's disgusting, Anita!!
Saying you'd put a hair on a soda can again!
...never mind
She was waitressing?
Of course. It paid off for her.
What a loser she is.
They trot her our every four years just to try and attack the Republicans.
Thanks for that memory. LOL
An unrepentant liar can be trusted to...lie.
Oh course she would, but next time for much, much money. There I fixed!!!
“She was waitressing?”
Good guess, but I think her duties were limited to the restrooms and windows.
doing an interview with the low-life sleaze ball Chelsea Handler is like doing an interview with Howard Stern.
Anita Hill has no standards.
Did she lose a job?
Nope, she was kicked upstairs to the University of Berkeley, then to Brandeis, Where she got a tenured faculty position. She had national level articles published in major outlets, sweet book deals, and face time on national media.
Some punishment!
“Average” annual salary is $168,920. Hill probably gets quite a bit more as a “Distinguished” Faculty Member.
A Supreme Court Justice gets $223,500.
Doesn’t Fortune have anything else to spend money on than pumping up the egos of aging feminists who should be spending their waning years in repentance and prayer before they are called before the judgment seat of God to answer for their sins against society? They could be using that money for research that increases the number of cockroaches in government housing.
LOL!
Of course she would do it again - just another soulless dem operative...
Go, Trump, GO!
I am SO stealing that line.
She is doing nothing more than reinforcing the definition of insanity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.