Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: semimojo
Interesting question. Among other things our overall standard of living would be lower because we would be spending more for the same goods than we do now,...

Lol, complete BS. In 20% of Amnerican families, no family member is employed. And in 20% of US families, the head of household is on one or more of the many means tested government poverty programs. We now spend more than a trillion per year on those means tested poverty programs.

That's where all those great 'savings' from imports from cheap labor nations can be found. We'd be many hundred billions better off with far more manufacturing jobs in the US and many beneficiaries of those poverty programs working in those jobs instead of receiving benefits.

Real employment is around 20% and we have no hope of balancing the budget until that figure is greatly reduced.

21 posted on 10/19/2016 11:31:08 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Will88
We'd be many hundred billions better off with far more manufacturing jobs in the US and many beneficiaries of those poverty programs working in those jobs instead of receiving benefits.

You want the government to force everyone to pay more than necessary for goods so we can fund more jobs.

Why not cut out the middleman,tax everyone and redistribute the money. It would be a lot more efficient than a big tariff scheme.

23 posted on 10/19/2016 1:04:18 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson