Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LCS Freedom CO fired after engine damages
Navy Times ^ | October 14, 2016 | Sam Fellman

Posted on 10/17/2016 7:00:13 AM PDT by RitchieAprile

The head of the surface Navy on Thursday fired the commanding officer of a littoral combat ship that damaged one of its main propulsion diesel engines in July.

Vice Adm. Tom Rowden cashiered the CO of Crew 106 of LCS Freedom, Cmdr. Michael Wohnhaas, “due to loss of confidence in his ability to effectively lead and carry out his assigned duties,” Naval Surface Force Pacific said in a Friday release announcing the removal.

“The loss of confidence followed an investigation into the facts and circumstances surrounding damage to the ship's number 2 main propulsion diesel engine (#2 MPDE) that occurred in the operation areas off the coast of southern California on July 11,” the SURFPAC release said. “No final decision has been made yet on the options for follow-on repairs to Freedom related to the July 11 engineering casualty.”

(Excerpt) Read more at navytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: lcs; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Little Pig; rjsimmon

About the only time the Navy possibly wouldn’t remove the CO is if they can conclusively determine that everything was done correctly, and that something failed anyway, and even then, I’d guess it depends on the situation.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
It used to be the CO would get nailed for something even if he was on leave etc...

Capt McVey (Indianapolis) was court-martialed even though he was ‘following standard orders’ and probably would have been court-martialed had he went against the ‘standing orders’(My speculation).

In McVey’s case the US Govt brought the Japanese Sub Commander to testify against him.

A lot changed after the Pueblo incident when it was found Bucher wasn’t ‘allowed’ into certain spaces aboard HIS ship so it was (rightfully) argued he couldn’t be held responsible for not destroying Classified Matter if he didn’t have access to it.

Noticed the USS Zumwalt launching had a CAPT as XO - wonder if this is SOP or he may have recently made CAPT.

I do know(?) a Carrier has a CAPT CO, XO and Engineering(?) also Flight Boss(?)

Don’t know if that is because too many CAPTS or not?????


21 posted on 10/17/2016 7:59:01 AM PDT by xrmusn ((6/98)" "If you see a civilian in cammies -- bump into him")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

Maybe he refused to gundeck performance records.


22 posted on 10/17/2016 8:01:16 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrmusn

Most of the bigger ships in the Navy are going to have several senior officer slots filled with people who hold the rank of Captain. That’s the whole reason behind the rank of “Commodore”, since a ship can only have one Captain. The rest get temporarily bumped to Commodore to eliminate confusion.


23 posted on 10/17/2016 8:25:35 AM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

I attended the commissioning of LCS1. One of the banners on the ship’s rail came undone during the ceremony and the command to bring the ship to life somehow got missed and took nearly half and awkward minute to be obeyed. Bad omens that seem to have been prophetic.


24 posted on 10/17/2016 8:26:53 AM PDT by CrazyIvan (Socialists are just communists in their larval stage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
It sucks to be captain when something goes wrong, even if it wasn’t your fault, you are responsible...

THE PRESS DEMOCRAT | October 14, 2016, 3:03PM

Officials at the Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit District said Friday every engine on 14 new rail cars — which, combined, cost nearly $50 million — are potentially at risk of failing and must be replaced. The stunning development will further contribute to delays in delivering passenger service promised nearly a decade ago under a taxpayer-funded rail initiative.

SMART had been aiming to launch passenger service by the end of the year, but Friday revised that plan and is now targeting late spring of 2017 to finally bring paying customers on board.

However, Farhad Mansourian, the agency’s general manager, conceded that even the new launch date may not be realistic, depending on resolution of the engine problems and progress made on safety testing.

The news that the rail agency also is dealing with a potential major problem related to train engines came more than three months after Mansourian and other SMART officials first were notified that a nearly identical rail car in Toronto had experienced a catastrophic engine failure with passengers on board. No injuries were reported.

The rail car was operating on a new line serving Toronto’s airport when a piston-rod penetrated the engine block and caused the train to lose power, Lisa Cobb, a paid SMART consultant, wrote in a letter attached to Mansourian’s staff report to the rail agency’s board of directors.

The car, operated by Metrolinx, is functionally identical to those used by SMART, and was purchased through an option on SMART’s procurement contract with Sumitomo Corp. of America.

The Diesel Multiple Units, as they are called, were developed at the Nippon Sharyo factory in Toyokawa, Japan and assembled at Sumitomo’s plant in Rochelle, Illinois, to comply with SMART’s federal funding requirement to manufacture and assemble the cars in the United States. The engines were built by Cummins, Inc.

According to Cobb, Sumitomo notified SMART officials about the Toronto engine failure on July 6. Two months later, on Sept. 7, the company alerted SMART that the underlying problem was a design flaw in the engine’s crankshaft

Ha...designed with Common Core maths.

25 posted on 10/17/2016 8:33:37 AM PDT by spokeshave (In the Thatch Weave,..Trump's Wing Man is Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
A certain level of respect is accorded when the crew knows that the CO’s head will roll.

And therefore, any crewmember with a bone to pick can easily deep six the CO's career. Sounds like facilitating mutiny to me.

26 posted on 10/17/2016 8:36:00 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

FYI

In my day the rank Commodore was a title - not a rank - it was offically a 1 star Admiral BUT the Navy Captains went from 4 Stripes to 2 Stars when promoted the Rear Admirals were classed RADM Upper & Lower but when Capt Joe went home on Fri with 4 stripes and came back on Mon with 2 Stars, the other Services with 1 star were sort of taken aback...
Appearances ya know....<: <: <:

A Captain of a ship is not necessarily a Four Striper O6 but the Commanding Officer of a Ship is called Captain no matter the rank.

Same as the Title Commodore (which goes back to J P JONES) was the title given to a Squadron Commander (more than a couple of ships under one command)no matter his rank.

A commodores rank was usually a step above the CO or someone on the verge of promotion.

Of course, in my day we were MEN (radioman, radarman, Boatswains Mate etc etc etc) so we naturally had to drop that because I guess it was confusing the ‘women’ and/or people who are or are not sure what they are from day to day.

Better to flush 250 or so years of tradition rather than ‘upset’ a fragile person....<: <:


27 posted on 10/17/2016 10:46:15 AM PDT by xrmusn ((6/98)" "If you see a civilian in cammies -- bump into him")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

Maybe the CO put a girl in charge of checking the oil level.


28 posted on 10/17/2016 10:56:49 AM PDT by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our one and only true hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right way right
Maybe the CO put a girl in charge of checking the oil level.

Ha...a 710 issue.

29 posted on 10/17/2016 2:47:13 PM PDT by spokeshave (In the Thatch Weave,..Trump's Wing Man is Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Freedom_(LCS-1)#Design


30 posted on 10/17/2016 4:18:02 PM PDT by GailA (Ret. SCPO wife: A politician that won't keep his word to Veterans/Military won't keep them to You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson