Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WMarshal

The polling data we’re being fed is based on the 2012 turnout model.

I think we can all agree, that’s not realistic in 2016. Our side will shatter records this year.


2 posted on 10/15/2016 11:23:27 PM PDT by jazminerose (oective)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jazminerose

You are correct - the 2012 models don’t capture this election and they will be wrong because they assume that Clinton will get the same votes as Obama. Won’t happen.

The alienation of Sanders supporters (usually reliable voters) may be viewed by history as a fatal mistake by her. Did she truly need to play the games she did to defeat him? Perhaps she did, but she may have won the battle (primary) and lost the war (election). Isn’t it par for the course that the media (and FR) spent so much time agonizing over Cruz supporters abandoning Trump when they were a fraction of Sanders supporters in real numbers?

In the end, more than anything Trump did or did not do, despite all of the hand wringing by a GOP elite that nobody likes..... it may be Clinton who has the knife in her back on election day.


5 posted on 10/15/2016 11:36:52 PM PDT by volunbeer (Clinton Cash = Proof of Corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: jazminerose

Plus it assumes Romney’s 27% of Hispanic vote. Trump is getting 38%.


18 posted on 10/16/2016 4:48:51 AM PDT by petercooper (MiniTrump for President 2060!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson