Your theory hinges on folks who would fake a shooting, commit dozens of incidents of fraud by faking identities, possibly killing people, and paying off a while town but balk at the idea of submitting fake evidence during a civil trial.
Something is fundamentally broken in your think.
I have never proposed any theory.
Real mock events/drills, admitted as such, occur all around the country. We can imagine that they require a lot of work to plan. Going from such an event to a mock event, which is portrayed as being a real-time event, also requires a lot more work. But it wouldn’t be that much harder to do. It would require more advance planning, and far more detailed recruiting of those involved, who would need to be vetted to be sure that they support the final agenda (such as gun control), and are potentially willing to play the role for years to come. Or willing to disappear.
The response of a willing and compliant media is easy. Look how they are coordinating with the Clinton campaign. Actually the media is a defacto adjunct of the Clinton campaign.
People are in general fearful of asking uncomfortable questions. They don’t want to lose friends, jobs or get kicked out of social arrangements like FR. It should not be that way in this country. What happened to 1st amendment freedoms? We are fed porno and sodomite propaganda on TV, yet we are not supposed to discuss matters such as this, with real potential consequences to our future as a Republic? Please.
The official SH narrative is simply not believable to anyone who spends an hour or two watching video footage and looking at the alleged photos of the crime scene. Moreover, the refusal of the authorities to answer basic questions in the aftermath, the public reactions of the authorities at the scene are all highly abnormal.