Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT says no libel, no retraction, no apology for Trump story
Associated Press ^ | Oct 13, 2016 8:51 PM EDT

Posted on 10/13/2016 8:56:57 PM PDT by Olog-hai

The New York Times on Thursday rejected Donald Trump’s claim the newspaper had libeled the Republican presidential nominee, saying its story about two women who said he sexually assaulted them was “newsworthy information about a subject of deep public concern.”

In a letter, Times attorney David McCraw said Trump “has bragged about his non-consensual sexual touching of women” and that multiple women had already come forward. “Nothing in our article has had the slightest effect on the reputation that Mr. Trump, through his own words and actions, has already created for himself,” he wrote. …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: libel; liberalmedia; lyingmedia; nyslimes; retraction; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Tzimisce

Please. Clinron foundation will pick up the tab. Or obambi will print out enough to cover the costs


41 posted on 10/14/2016 3:24:12 AM PDT by thefixisin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
The New York Times on Thursday rejected Donald Trump’s claim the newspaper had libeled the Republican presidential nominee, saying its story about two women who said he sexually assaulted them was “newsworthy information about a subject of deep public concern.”

The New York Times has time on its side in its slanderous, despicable article about Trump. The NYT will lose if sued, but that will not happen before Nov. 8.

Given that the MSM is in a coordinated attack against Donald Trump for the next four weeks, they have pulled their goalie and are pressing a power play to put him away.

They are counting on Trump losing the election to Hillary, then they will have the resources of the corrupt Clinton administration at their disposal. Do you not agree?

42 posted on 10/14/2016 3:46:24 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

Oh, no question. Also, there she is on the UWS in Manhattan and her daughter is a big lib (looks like a retired teacher) who gushed on social media not that long ago about the thrill of a VIP meeting with Joe Biden in the WH.

She’s a Dem insider trumping up a decades ago beyond improbable story.


43 posted on 10/14/2016 3:55:11 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Not a legal argument at all. What they are trying to do is frame him with false accusers - doesn’t matter if he had actually been caught acting on his words; what they are doing is illegal.


44 posted on 10/14/2016 4:58:31 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

NYT, you are not a judge after being presented with the civil case against yourself. Let’s see what a judge has to say in civil court over damages.


45 posted on 10/14/2016 5:14:31 AM PDT by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: timestax
 photo 9e5ed6d7-82a4-4351-8c32-67f5446a1fc0_zpsyunbbjee.jpg
46 posted on 10/14/2016 3:38:58 PM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic EnemyKristol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson