Posted on 10/12/2016 10:09:23 AM PDT by reed13k
Link is to the reddit copy I read, I'll see if I can find the original wikileaks version. Basically this is Podesta's one word agreeement "Yup" with Sen Mark Kirk's statement that the Iran deal is the biggest appeasement since Chamberlain and will require the next generation to clean up a nuclear war in the ME.
https://i.reddituploads.com/c1b65351c86f49afadac199b138e12bf?fit=max&h=1536&w=1536&s=ae2cfb532debfc8167c3377b59734ee5
try again to make it clickable:
“Yup” with implied sarcasm?
Yup with implied sarcasm?
Yup with implied sarcasm?
Yup with implied sarcasm?
Czechoslovakia seems to be doing okay.../S
Bkmrk.
Bkmrk.
Even liberals don't like nukes and a LIBERAL is saying the Iran deal is a bad deal, in the worst way possible.
Played right this could be the one that snaps people awake again about how nuts and dangerous Obama and Hillary are.
Any Jewish journalists left who might support israel and care if it gets nuked? Hill and Barry sure don’t. Can’t wait actually. The bigger problem here is the ayatollahs would still much rather nuke NYC, DC, Chicago, LA, name your iconic American symbol here, first before taking care of local business and hatred.
This is big because Trump has been saying this is the case for the last two years and the Dems, Obama, and HRC have been saying it was a great achievement.
I agree, they would rather hit us first, so the US won’t be in a position to do anything about the second hit, Israel.
This email really needs to go viral in the right way. Drudge?
We are second, and probably a distant second. Iran’s first target is Saudi Arabia.
Bttt.
5.56mm
Another aspect of this email is just how chummy RINO Kirk is with Podesta.
Why can’t folks just reference the original mails.. instead of all these silly links... Here is is:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/727
There is poor context here... the YUP does not mean an agreement with the quote... since the email chain is so brief its tough to know what Podesta is Yupping to exactly...
Could be yup, that’s the quote and article we were talking about earlier, or it could be something else... like a bit more context before I would play that off as a smoking gun of him agreeing with the quote extracted as fact.
Though I do agree with the quote personally.
Is it because Obama wanted to help Iran and his Muslim bretheren or was it a foolish attempt to solve the many ME problems?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.