So let me get this straight, the Washington Post and the rest of the elite media regard Trump walking in on partly clothed beauty contestants back in 2005 more newsworthy than what was reveled in Wikileaks concerning the internals and workings of Hillary’s tenure as Secretary of State and political campaigns?
It’s absurd, the left taking the moral high ground. But, they are desperate.
SMEAR SMEAR SMEAR— No there there. I don’t care if he did but I think this one is a total lie. Now WAPO — WIKI WIKI WIKI!! — Huge breaking news but you don’t do news do you? You do last minute smear jobs for a criminal liar running as a socialist for president. You need to file for “in kind”political contributions or you will be committing a crime also. The WAPO is yellow journalism!
Yep! You got that right. Welcome to the new Information Age comrade!
How many people read and respect the Washington Post?
How many read and respect WikiLeaks?
The answer to those two questions are really all that matter. Oh, and if anyone thinks the "alternate media" is going to spread the truth about the differences between the two candidates well don't look to anyone posting it Facebook anytime soon, not if one doesn't want to get assaulted for the truth. The content on Facebook is controlled one way or another.
Where is this "alternate media" that's going to save the country?
What do people recognize and trust more? MrAnonymousBlog.com or Facebook? (IOW the same questions as posed above)
Like I said get used to the new Information Age. Where we have access to much more information than ever before, proving the left's depravity. And STILL no way to disseminate it.
It's great yeah?