Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
It could, and it did. The Star did a DNA comparison in 1999 using blood samples from Williams and his mother, and the DNA results from Bill Clinton run as part of the Ken Starr investigation.,/p>

I am highly skeptical of the Starr investigation results actually being Clinton's.... they could have used the actual results in their investigation and some other DNA was substituted after the fact for the reports etc and this may have been allowed on some privacy grounds.

28 posted on 10/12/2016 7:01:05 AM PDT by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: hecticskeptic
I am highly skeptical of the Starr investigation results actually being Clinton's.... they could have used the actual results in their investigation and some other DNA was substituted after the fact for the reports etc and this may have been allowed on some privacy grounds.

Yeah they're all in on it.

37 posted on 10/12/2016 7:11:11 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson