Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

These New Images Of Chinese Aircraft Carrier Should Concern India
NDTV ^ | October 11, 2016 | Vishnu Som

Posted on 10/11/2016 9:58:53 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

The Type 001A aircraft carrier is the first one made in China for the Chinese Navy.

New images indicate that China is racing towards completion of its first home-grown aircraft carrier.

A month after NDTV reported that the hull of the ship, designated the Type 001-A, appeared complete, a fresh set of images indicates that the "island" of the carrier, in many ways the nerve-centre of the warship, has now been installed ahead of sea-trials commencing.

The "island" consists of the warship's bridge, aviation facilities and battle-control spaces. Radars and sensors are mounted on the island in addition to air intakes and funnels from its engines.

Completed structure of Type 001-A, China's first home-grown aircraft carrier (right).

The Type 001-A, which is being constructed at a dry dock in the port city of Dalian to the East of Beijing, will likely weigh in at 60,000 tonnes and host close to 50 aircraft including 36 J-15 fighters, a Chinese replica of the Russian Su-27.

The process of completing trials will, however, take a few years and the new Chinese carrier is unlikely to join the navy before 2020.

Completed structure of Type 001-A, China's first home-grown aircraft carrier.

The 001-A is the second Chinese aircraft carrier and its design is thought to be based on the Russian-designed Liaoning, from the Ukraine several years after the collapse of the USSR.

Significantly, new images have emerged on Chinese social media of a new variant of the J-15 fighter, designated the J-15A. The nose-wheel of the fighter features a catapult launch mechanism which clearly indicates that subsequent Chinese aircraft carriers and their strike fighters will likely be more capable.

Chinese J-15A prototype featuring nose-wheel catapult launch assembly.

A catapult launch system, which is hooked up to the nose-wheel of planes launched from ships, uses a compressed steam-driven piston drive or an electromagnetic aircraft launch system (EMALS) to propel a fully-loaded fighter jet off the small deck of an aircraft carrier. At the moment, the Liaoning and the Type 001-A use a "ski-jump" ramp where fighter jets use only the power of their own engines to accelerate down the runway of the ship before being propelled off its deck. Without the additional acceleration provided by a catapult system, China's existing J-15 fighters have to be lighter to take off and consequently carry fewer weapons and possibly fuel, making them significantly less capable during operational deployments.

The pace of completion of China's first home-grown aircraft carrier is a matter of concern for the Indian Navy. India's indigenous aircraft carrier, named Vikrant (after the first carrier to enter its fleet), is nowhere close to completion despite having been launched in Kochi a full three years before China's 001-A.

Vikrant, India's first indigenous aircraft carrier. (File)

The Vikrant will, at the very least, take nine years from start to finish point of joining the navy. The Chinese warship, on the other hand, will have made that same journey in three years.

Though the hull, superstructure and engines of the Vikrant have been integrated, its primary sensor, the Israeli MF-STAR (Multi-Function Surveillance, Track and Guidance) radar and Barak 8 Long Range surface to air missiles have not yet been acquired for this project.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aircraftcarrier; china; india

1 posted on 10/11/2016 9:58:53 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The differential in build times (3 years vs 9) is due in part to the massive inflow of capital into state coffers from Chinese export sales. A portion of the profit from every China-made item sold at Lowes, Wal-Mart, Harbor Freight, etc. is going towards modernizing the PRC’s armed forces (including building this carrier).

Prior to WWII, Japan was sent scrap metal which it turned into ships, tanks, guns, and planes. The Chinese are much more efficient. They’ve figured out a way to have the West just send them money directly.


2 posted on 10/11/2016 10:14:44 PM PDT by Captain Rhino (also)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It shouldn’t just concern India, but ALL of us!


3 posted on 10/11/2016 11:33:05 PM PDT by TEXOKIE (We must surrender only to our Holy God and never to the evil that has befallen us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“Vikrant, India’s first indigenous aircraft carrier.”

Are those holes down the side where the oars stick out?


4 posted on 10/12/2016 12:43:31 AM PDT by PLMerite (Lord, let me die fighting lions. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE

My guess is that both of these ships will be housing for the homeless long before they are warships. Although the metal will be radioactive.


5 posted on 10/12/2016 2:24:41 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Brace. Brace. Brace. Heads down. Do not look up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Captain Rhino

I don’t know if you read about the demonstrations in Beijing by former army soldiers over the last few days. This is in response to China’s plan to cut the strength of the PLA by 300,000 troops in order to pay for Naval and Air modernization programs. So even with all the profits they are making trading with the US... it isn’t enough.


6 posted on 10/12/2016 4:15:50 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
ping
7 posted on 10/12/2016 4:18:40 AM PDT by Chode (You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience, NOTHING! ich bin ein Deplorable...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE

Just imagine all the upgrade plans theyll be able to purchase for it from a new and even more corrupted (if it were possible) Clinton Administration.


8 posted on 10/12/2016 5:32:36 AM PDT by captmar-vell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It’s a Navy Cross just waiting to happen.


9 posted on 10/12/2016 5:44:30 AM PDT by paddles ("The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Mixed bag actually.

If you want to be a credible global power, you need to be able to project your forces in strength to any point in the world. Hence the need to modernize and expand the air force and the navy. Paying for a bunch of PLA divisions that are essentially stuck in China (because you cannot readily move them) and are no longer needed for homeland defense (because the Russians are not coming and the Americans never were - at least on the ground) is a poor use of defense dol...er, yuan.

If you maintain that unneeded ground force structure, you are obliged to have a plan and to allocate funds to modernize it at some point. If you don’t modernize it, it impacts troop morale, quality of their leadership and training suffers, you still have to maintain their old, obsolete equipment and facilities, and, to your point, you still have to pay them. A RIF solves all those problems.

You are right though, the government funding barrel isn’t bottomless even in China and what there is has not been all that well managed. Hence all those modern Chinese cities in places where no Chinese wants to live in (or can find a job in after construction is finished).

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=chinese+ghost+cities


10 posted on 10/12/2016 5:56:29 AM PDT by Captain Rhino (also)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chode
Thanks...boy, the communists sure do build some butt-ugly ships, but...the Zumwalt class could only be loved by a mother...

(although the dazzle camo I photoshopped in does make it look more war-like...) LOL, looks like a big, surfaced submarine!

11 posted on 10/12/2016 6:07:20 AM PDT by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

What a thought - God help us.


12 posted on 10/12/2016 11:15:17 AM PDT by TEXOKIE (We must surrender only to our Holy God and never to the evil that has befallen us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: captmar-vell

Oh please, God forbid!


13 posted on 10/12/2016 11:15:46 AM PDT by TEXOKIE (We must surrender only to our Holy God and never to the evil that has befallen us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
you did the dazzle??? OUTSTANDING!!! i love the old dazzle paint schemes
14 posted on 10/12/2016 3:22:57 PM PDT by Chode (You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience, NOTHING! ich bin ein Deplorable...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Chode
I'm with you on that!


15 posted on 10/12/2016 5:40:44 PM PDT by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Chode
I'm with you on that!


16 posted on 10/12/2016 5:42:02 PM PDT by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
USS Hornet

not sure

USS Alabama

DDG 81

17 posted on 10/12/2016 6:43:36 PM PDT by Chode (You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience, NOTHING! ich bin ein Deplorable...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Wow! That made the Winston Churchill hard to see even in the photograph!


18 posted on 10/13/2016 4:41:45 AM PDT by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Captain Rhino
I missed this the first time I read it:

"...a fresh set of images indicates that the "island" of the carrier, in many ways the nerve-centre of the warship, has now been installed ahead of sea-trials commencing..."

LOL, I sure hope so!

19 posted on 10/13/2016 4:46:07 AM PDT by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson