Posted on 10/04/2016 12:35:55 PM PDT by tellw
Fakes?
___________________________________________________
No, I believe the statement about fakes was meant to be sarcasm. My comment was in agreement with the “move along” comment, that a lot of die-hard Hillary voters would go along with anything she does, and still vote for her.
Agreed. Thanks for your response!
Yep looks like the leak is legit. The size alone screams legit, as does the fact checking that has been going on with it.
And more data is being uploaded all the time. This really is the jackpot, and as I have always thought, if you open the Clinton closet you are going to find EVERYONE in our gov’t in there....
was #Clintonfoundation #hacking #DNC #HillaryClinton didn’t trust #dnc #DNC2016
bookmark
Why does it seem like this story is already dead. Drudge even dropped it in almost record time.
It may have been on the Clinton Foundation server which would be very. very bad for the Clintons
It depends upon what follows.
Sadly TARP money going to polticians is not a new story.
http://www.newsweek.com/tarp-funds-get-recycled-political-contributions-75963
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB125616828727300265
Chief of Staff.
Sure seems dead already doesnt it. Not even. Ear the top on FR anymore.
Nothing to see here, move along people.....
On the up side over on reddit they were waking guys up and getting them going on sifting through all the data. It seemed like Christmas to them. I hope that they go through the info real good, I’m sure there are some real nuggets in there, especially if the hack is from the clinton foundations server.
I am perplexed that the threads here on FR didnt even make 500. Seems like we get to 500 talking less important things all the time....
Well, Guccifer2.0 is almost certainly Russian Intelligence, and the documents are pretty clearly repurposed documents from the (legitimate) DNC hack earlier this year. For example, why would the Clinton Foundation keep a file listing bank contributions to the DCCC cross-referenced with TARP funds?
I mean, the Clintons are evil, they aren’t stupid. Look at the trail of bodies they’ve left in their wake and gotten away with it. The kind of evil we’re facing is worse than Obama, who is merely incompetent and empty-headed. The Clintons are determined, thoughtful, CAREFUL evil.
There is no way this is a new, legitimate leak.
It’s a ham-fisted misinformation campaign by the russkies, trying to throw uncertainty into the election - for whatever reason.
Oh, the eeeevil “ruskies”. I’m so sick of that “meme”.
So this was made public (although not all the details apparently) in 2009.
We have descended into the depths of such corruption that only a huge, massive overhaul and lots of arrests and heavy sentences can get us out of it.
Not quite enough to retire on but it wouldn't take many donations like that to account for Mrs. Hoyer's new Mercedes... tax free, or reported to the tax man? I'm sure the IRS is just all over this. /s
The media will treat it like run of the mill political corruption, which honestly, considering the political party involved, they would have a point.
Does anyone know how to make the most recent comments at Reddit come up? I tried to load new comments, search for new comments, nada, can’t figure it out there.
No one cared then, no one cares now. :-(
Very interesting find. Something odd I noticed about your post/reply -I was still left wondering if this “While on Capitol Hill, Pam Simon, an OFA volunteer and former aide to Congresswoman Gabby Giffords who was wounded in the Tucson shooting, spoke with Senator Jeff Flake in the hall way. Simon told Flake that they were there to deliver the 1.4 million signatures to Congress and Flake made it clear that he knew OFA and other activists weren’t going away and that he was still hoping to come to a compromise and pass some form of gun violence prevention legislation.” was actually in the documents.
So I googled this statement and a link to this thread pops up but it includes the statement this is the contents of one of the folders I got from there. (which was the clarification I was looking for-just odd, I noticed your post came over twice but didn’t say that the statement came from the hacked info.) Does that make sense?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.